Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ALLIANCE RECYCLING CENTER INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ALLIANCE RECYCLING CENTER INC. in 15969 RIVER ST., ALLIANCE, OH 44601 (NAICS 562998). OSHA activity number 331090951.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Alliance Recycling Center INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Alliance Recycling Center INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
15969 RIVER ST.
City
ALLIANCE
State
OH
ZIP
44601
Mailing
P. O. BOX 2703, ALLIANCE, OH 44601
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
562998
Employees
20
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Mar 30, 2012
Abate by
Apr 29, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,940 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees, in that employees were exposed to fall and crushing hazards:    On or about 10/7/11, employees riding a conveyor belt, approximately 13 feet 10 inches high at its highest point, near the opening of the baler, were exposed to hazards such as, but not limited to, fall hazards, due to accumulated cardboard and noncardboard materials on the belt; and crushing injuries, with increased proximity to the baler.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2940
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.132 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Mar 30, 2012
Abate by
Apr 29, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1):     The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards were present, or were likely to be present, which would have necessitated the use of personal protective equipment (PPE):    On or about 10/7/11, a workplace hazard assessment was not performed to determine appropriate personal protective equipment for hazards such as, but not limited to:  lacerations and flying particles.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1680
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.132 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Mar 30, 2012
Abate by
Apr 29, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(h)(1):     Except as provided by paragraphs (h)(2) through (h)(6) of this section, the protective equipment, including personal protective equipment (PPE), used to comply with this part, was not provided by the employer at no cost to employees.    On and before 10/7/11, the employer had not provided personal protective equipment such as, but not limited to:  gloves, for employees required to sort through waste for recyclables.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Mar 30, 2012
Abate by
May 31, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,940 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i):     The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator was competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l).                                                                                                                                         On or before 10/7/11, lift truck operators were not trained as required.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2940
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Mar 30, 2012
Abate by
Apr 29, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):     Employers did not develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning,material safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met, and which also includes the following:    On and before 10/7/11, the employer had not developed a Hazard Communication Program for chemicals such as, but not limited to: propane.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.1200 G01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 30, 2012
Abate by
Apr 29, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1):     The employer did not have a material safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they use.    On and before 10/7/11, the employer did not maintain material safety data sheets for chemicals such as, but not limited to; Fiberglass Resin, and Cool-Gard II.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Mar 30, 2012
Abate by
May 11, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training as specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1) and -2 on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard was introduced into their work area:          On and before 10/7/11, employees were not provided training on hazardous chemicals  such as, but limited to; Fiberglass Resin and Cool-Gard II.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1904.29 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 30, 2012
Abate by
Apr 29, 2012
Penalty
Initial $700 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.29(a):     The OSHA 300 form, (Log of Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses), the 300-A (Summary of Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses), and the OSHA 301 form (Injury and Illness Incident Report) were not maintained as required:    The employer did not maintain OSHA 300, 300-A, or 301 forms for this site, for the years 2011, 2010, and 2009.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $700

View Alliance Recycling Center INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 331090951.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.