MADISON, WI —
OSHA Inspection: AMERICAN PRINTING COMPANY, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of AMERICAN PRINTING COMPANY, INC. in 2909 SYENE ROAD, MADISON, WI 53713 (NAICS 323110). OSHA activity number 331109199.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- AMERICAN PRINTING COMPANY, INC.
- Site address
- 2909 SYENE ROAD
- City
- MADISON
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53713
- Mailing
- 2909 SYENE ROAD, MADISON, WI 53713
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 323110
- Employees
- 66
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.147 C04 II
- Issued
- Apr 27, 2012
- Abate by
- Jun 15, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,975 · Current $1,785 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii): Procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the scope, purpose, authorization, rules, and techniques to be utilized for the control of hazardous energy, and the means to enforce compliance including, but not limited to, 29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(A), (c)(4)(ii)(B), (c)(4)(ii)(C) and (c)(4)(ii)(D)(h): The employer did not develop machine specific lockout/tagout procedures that outline the scope, purpose, authorization, rules, and techniques to be utilized for the control of hazardous energy, and the means to enforce compliance for various pieces of equipment, including but not limited to: a) 40-6S Mitsubishi Press b) 40-6S Mitsubishi chiller c) 40-6S Mitsubishi Dryer d) 40-6S Mitsubishi Coater e) Cortron Page Stripper f) Cutter #2 g) Cutter #3
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1785
- — Z (S) $2975
1910.147 C06 I
- Issued
- Apr 27, 2012
- Abate by
- Jun 15, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed: The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedures at least annually to ensure that the procedures and the requirements of this standard were being followed, including but not limited to, the following procedures: a) 40-6S Mitsubishi Press b) 40-6S Mitsubishi chiller c) 40-6S Mitsubishi Dryer d) 40-6S Mitsubishi Coater e) Cortron Page Stripper f) Cutter #2 g) Cutter #3
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Apr 27, 2012
- Abate by
- May 30, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,380 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Machine guarding was not provided to protect operator(s) and other employees from hazard(s) created by an ingoing nip point: Employees in the mailing department were not protected from the hazards created by an ingoing nip point located on the Cheshire TLS system.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $2380
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- Apr 27, 2012
- Abate by
- May 11, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed through written certification that identified the workplace evaluated; the person certifying that the evaluation had been performed; the date(s) of the hazard assessment; and, identified the document as a certification of the hazard assessment. The employer did not complete a personal protective equipment hazard assessment for production areas.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.132 F04
- Issued
- Apr 27, 2012
- Abate by
- May 11, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(f)(4): The employer did not verify that each affected employee had received and understood the required PPE training through a written certification that contained the name of each employee trained, the date(s) of training, and that identified the subject of the certification. The employer did not complete a written certification for training on personal protective equipment for production areas.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at American Printing Company, INC.
View American Printing Company, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 323110)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 331109199.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.