Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MOSSER CONSTRUCTION INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MOSSER CONSTRUCTION INC. in 20951 DETROIT RD, ROCKY RIVER, OH 44116 (NAICS 236220). OSHA activity number 331906354.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Mosser Construction INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Mosser Construction INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
20951 DETROIT RD
City
ROCKY RIVER
State
OH
ZIP
44116
Mailing
122 S. WILSON AVE., FREMONT, OH 43420
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236220
Employees
100
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.453 B02 V

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v):     A body belt was not worn and/or a lanyard was not attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift:  Note:  As of January 1, 1998, subpart M of this part (1926.502(d)) provides that body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system.  The use of a body belt in a tethering system or in a restraint system is acceptable and is regulated    On or before February 2, 2012, during construction activities, the employer allowed subcontractor employees to operate an aerial lift and did not ensure that the employees were protected from falls by the use of a personal fall arrest system or restraint system.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $4900
  • — Z (S) $4900

1926.501 B01

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1):     Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.    On or before February 2, 2012, during construction activities, the employer allowed plumbing subcontractor employees to work on a roof that was approximately 25 feet high and did not ensure that the employees were protected from falls.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $4900
  • — Z (S) $4900

1926.501 B10

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10):     Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs, with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest.        On or before February 2, 2012, during roofing activities, the employer did not ensure that a subcontractors employees were protected from falls of 22 feet to the ground.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $4900
  • — Z (S) $4900

1926.760 A01

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.760(a)(1):     Each employee engaged in a steel erection activity who is on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge more than 15 feet (4.6 m) above a lower level was not protected from fall hazards by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, positioning device systems, or fall restraint systems.    On or before February 2, 2021, during steel erection activities, the employer did not ensure that a subcontractors employees were protected from falls of 22 feet to the ground.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $4900
  • — Z (S) $4900

View Mosser Construction INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 331906354.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.