FRANKLIN PARK, IL ·
OSHA Inspection: VENUS PROCESSING AND STORAGE, INC.
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of VENUS PROCESSING AND STORAGE, INC. in 2401 25TH AVE, FRANKLIN PARK, IL 60131 (NAICS 332114). OSHA activity number 331911065.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- VENUS PROCESSING AND STORAGE, INC.
- Site address
- 2401 25TH AVE
- City
- FRANKLIN PARK
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 60131
- Mailing
- 2401 25TH AVE, FRANKLIN PARK, IL 60131
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332114
- Employees
- 85
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
11 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 18, 2012
- Abate by
- May 3, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,600 Reduced
General-duty citation text
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazard of struck by injuries. a) Venus Processing and Storage, Inc., at the material storage and loading areas - The employer did not conduct frequent inspections on the underhung electric hoists to ensure that damaged equipment such as hooks and pendant control directional buttons, were taken out of service until repaired. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable means of abatement to correct this hazard is to conform with the requirements of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers for Overhead Hoists (Underhung) - ASME B30.16-2007, Inspection, Testing, and Maintenance, chapter 16-2.1-16-2.1.3., by requiring the implementation of not only periodic inspections, but also frequent inspections which include the Pendant boxes, hooks, and chains.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1600
- · Z (S) $2800
1910.22 C
- Issued
- Apr 18, 2012
- Abate by
- May 31, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,600 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.22(c): Covers and/or guardrails were not provided to protect personnel from the hazards of open pits, tanks, vats, ditches, etc. a) In the Production Shop - At the Minster Power Press (#17), the floor pit into which persons could accidently walk was not guarded by a cover and/or guardrail.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1600
- · Z (S) $2800
1910.147 D04 I
- Issued
- Apr 18, 2012
- Abate by
- May 31, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $2,800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(4)(i): Lockout or tagout devices were not affixed to each energy isolating device by authorized employees. a) In the Machine Shop - The employer does not require employees to lockout or tagout mechanical equipment during the die setting process on the roll forming machines, mechanical power presses, and press brakes.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2800
- · Z (S) $4900
1910.157 G01
- Issued
- Apr 18, 2012
- Abate by
- May 31, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(1): An educational program was not provided for all employees to familiarize them with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting: a) An educational program was not provided for all employees to familiarize them with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1200
- · Z (S) $2100
1910.178 L04 III
- Issued
- Apr 18, 2012
- Abate by
- May 3, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $2,800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was no conducted at least once every three years. a) The employer did not train and evaluate forklift truck operator's performance once every three years.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2800
- · Z (S) $4900
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Apr 18, 2012
- Abate by
- May 31, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $2,800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, in running nip points, and rotating parts. a) In the Production Area - The Air Ram Press (single) and the Air Ram Press (triple), were not guarded at the point of operation. b) In the Production Area(s) - Throughout the metal roll forming lines and coil dispensers, perimeter guards were not provided to protect employees from amputation and laceration hazards while metal is moving through the roll forming machine.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2800
- · Z (S) $4900
1910.212 A02
- Issued
- Apr 18, 2012
- Abate by
- May 31, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(2): Guards were not affixed to the machine where possible and secured elsewhere if for any reason attachment to the machine is not possible. a) In the Production Area - At line #21 Roll Forming Machine - The guard was damaged and did not completely enclose the point of operation and moving parts, while the machine was in operation. b) In the Production Area - At line #22 Roll Forming Machine - The guard was removed while machine was in operation. c) In the Production Area - At Press Brake 401, 402, 403 - The ring guards were missing on the hand controls. d) In the Production Area - At Press Brake 521 - The emergency stop cable was missing at the back of machine where employees remove scrap materials.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.219 D01
- Issued
- Apr 18, 2012
- Abate by
- May 3, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(d)(1): Pulley(s) with part(s) seven feet or less from the floor or work platform were not guarded in accordance with the requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o): a) In the Production Area Roll Forming Machine #32 - The employer did not guard the moving parts of the pulley.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1200
- · Z (S) $2100
1910.219 E03 I
- Issued
- Apr 18, 2012
- Abate by
- May 3, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(e)(3)(i): Vertical or inclined belt(s) were not enclosed by guard(s) conforming to the requirements specified at 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o): a) In the Production Area Roll Forming Machine #32 - The employer did not guard the moving parts of the belt and pulley.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.157 C01
- Issued
- Apr 18, 2012
- Abate by
- May 3, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1): The employer did not ensure to mount, locate, and identify portable fire extinguishers so that they are readily accessible to employees without subjecting the employees to possible injury. a) In the Production Plant - Portable fire extinguishers were not mounted, located and identified so that they were readily accessible without subjecting the employees to injuries.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.305 B01 II
- Issued
- Apr 18, 2012
- Abate by
- May 3, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(ii): Unused openings in cabinets, boxes, and fittings were not effectively closed. a) In the Production Plant on the East Wall - The electrical box by line #21, had three unused openings that were not effectively closed with covers (knockouts).
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections at Venus Processing and Storage, INC.
View Venus Processing and Storage, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332114)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 331911065.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.