Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: FLEX TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of FLEX TECHNOLOGIES, INC. in 5498 GUNDY DRIVE, MIDVALE, OH 44653 (NAICS 326121). OSHA activity number 332429422.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Flex Technologies, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Flex Technologies, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
5498 GUNDY DRIVE
City
MIDVALE
State
OH
ZIP
44653
Mailing
P.O. BOX 400, MIDVALE, OH 44653
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
326121
Employees
30
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Mar 6, 2012
Abate by
Feb 10, 2013
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii):  The procedures shall clearly and specifically outline the scope, purpose, authorization, rules, and techniques to be utilized for the control of hazardous energy, and the means to enforce compliance including, but not limited to, the following:    a.  At the workplace, the employer's written lockout/tagout program did not clearly outline the scope, purpose, rules, and techniques; means to enforce compliance such as periodic inspections and disciplianary action; a specific statement of the intended use of the procedure; and specific procedural steps for the removal of lockout or tagout devices and the responsibility for them.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $500
  • — C (S) $5000
  • — Z (S) $5000

1910.147 C05 II D

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 6, 2012
Abate by
Apr 5, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(5)(ii)(D):  Identifiable.  Lockout devices and tagout devices shall indicate the identity of the employee applying the device(s):    a.  In the production area, the Nelmor grinder G-3 which was locked and tagged out did not indicate the identity of the employee who applied the lockout and tagout devices.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C06 I

Repeat 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Mar 6, 2012
Abate by
Feb 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $25,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i):  The employer shall conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirements of this standard are being followed:    a.  At the workplace, the employer did not conduct and certify periodic lockout/tagout inspections at least annually.    FLEX TECHNOLOGIES, INC., WAS PREVIOUSLY CITED FOR A VIOLATION OF THIS OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH STANDARD 29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i), WHICH WAS CONTAINED IN OSHA INSPECTION NUMBER 311835326 (OIS NUMBER 50123), CITATION NUMBER 1, ITEM NUMBER 2b, AND WAS AFFIRMED AS A FINAL ORDER ON JULY 25, 2008, WITH RESPECT TO A WORKPLACE LOCATED AT 5479 GUNDY DRIVE, MIDVALE, OHIO 44653.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (R) $1000
  • — C (R) $25000
  • — Z (R) $25000

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Mar 6, 2012
Abate by
Feb 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2):  The employer shall verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated; the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed; the date(s) of the hazard assessment; and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment:    a.  At the workplace, the employer did not certifiy that a personal protective equipment hazard assessment was performed.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Flex Technologies, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 332429422.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.