BROOKFIELD, CT —
OSHA Inspection: M.A.M. CONTRACTING, INC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of M.A.M. CONTRACTING, INC in 360 FEDERAL RD, BROOKFIELD, CT 06804 (NAICS 236115). OSHA activity number 332790146.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- M.A.M. CONTRACTING, INC
- Site address
- 360 FEDERAL RD
- City
- BROOKFIELD
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06804
- Mailing
- 19 PLEASANTVILLE RD, OSSINING, NY 10562
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236115
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.304 I01
- Issued
- Mar 26, 2012
- Abate by
- Apr 2, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $3,000 · Current $3,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.304(i)(1): Each circular hand-fed ripsaw was not guarded by a hood which completely enclosed that portion of the saw above the table and that portion of the saw above the material being cut: Worksite: Employees were using a Dewalt DW744 table saw to cut and rip trim work which was not equipped with a guard.
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $3000
- — I (S) $2100
- — Z (S) $3000
1926.451 F07
- Issued
- Mar 26, 2012
- Abate by
- Apr 2, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $3,000 · Current $3,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration:; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person. Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the scaffolding had been inspected by a competent person prior to allowing employees to begin working from it.
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $3000
- — I (S) $2100
- — Z (S) $3000
1926.701 B
- Issued
- Mar 26, 2012
- Abate by
- Mar 27, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $4,200
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.701(b): All protruding reinforcing steel, onto and/or into which employees could fall or come against, was not guarded to eliminate the hazard of impalement: Worksite: The employer did not ensure that all exposed reinforcing steel bars which posed an impalement hazard had been properly covered and/or guarded.
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $4200
- — I (S) $2400
- — Z (S) $4200
1926.451 G01 VII
- Issued
- Mar 26, 2012
- Abate by
- Mar 29, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $4,200
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section. Worksite: An employee who was working on a combination ladder jack/wall bracket scaffold at a height between 9 feet 4 inches and 18 feet above the ground was not provided with fall protection.
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $4200
- — I (S) $2400
- — Z (S) $4200
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Mar 26, 2012
- Abate by
- Mar 27, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $3,000 · Current $3,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems. Worksite: Employees who were walking and working on the first floor were exposed to fall hazards of up to 17 feet due to unguarded wall and window openings.
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $3000
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $3000
More inspections at M.A.M. Contracting, INC
View M.A.M. Contracting, INC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236115)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 332790146.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.