NEW HAVEN, CT —
OSHA Inspection: COLONY HARDWARE CORPORATION
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of COLONY HARDWARE CORPORATION in 15 STILES STREET, NEW HAVEN, CT 06512 (NAICS 423710). OSHA activity number 332801638.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- COLONY HARDWARE CORPORATION
- Site address
- 15 STILES STREET
- City
- NEW HAVEN
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06512
- Mailing
- 15 STILES STREET, NEW HAVEN, CT 06512
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 423710
- Employees
- 103
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.37 B02
- Issued
- Apr 25, 2012
- Abate by
- Apr 28, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $3,600 · Current $2,160 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(2): Each exit must be clearly visible and marked by a sign reading "Exit." Establishment: The emergency exit door in the shipping department was not marked with an exit sign. ABATED DURING THE INSPECTION.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $2160
- — Z (S) $3600
1910.37 B05
- Issued
- Apr 25, 2012
- Abate by
- Apr 28, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(5): Each doorway or passage along an exit access that could be mistaken for an exit must be marked "Not an Exit" or similar designation, or be identified by a sign indicating its actual use (e.g., closet). Establishment: The "door", not an exit and facing west in the Receiving department was not marked "Not an Exit". ABATED DURING THE INSPECTION.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.178 L04 III
- Issued
- Apr 25, 2012
- Abate by
- May 25, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $3,600 · Current $2,160 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance shall be conducted at least once every three years. Establishment: The employer had not evaluated the performance of the the powered industrial truck (PIT) operator at least once every three years.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $2160
- — Z (S) $3600
1910.178 L06
- Issued
- Apr 25, 2012
- Abate by
- May 25, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): The employer shall certify that each operator has been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l). The certification shall include the name of the operator, the date of the training, the date of the evaluation, and the identity of the person(s) performing the training or evaluation. Establishment: The employer had not ensured through written certifications that all operators of the powered industrial forklift trucks were trained and evaluated.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.178 A06
- Issued
- Apr 25, 2012
- Abate by
- May 25, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $3,600 · Current $2,160 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(6): The user shall see that all nameplates and markings are in place and are maintained in a legible condition. Establishment: The nameplate of the Nissan powered industrial truck (PIT) was not legible.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $2160
- — Z (S) $3600
1904.29 B01
- Issued
- Apr 25, 2012
- Abate by
- May 25, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.29(b)(1): The OSHA 300 log of work-related injuries and illnesses was not completed in detail as follows: Establishment: No check marks entered in Column (M)(1) through (M)(6) for the Case No 12-2 recorded in the OSHA 300 for the year of 2012.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Apr 25, 2012
- Abate by
- May 25, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer shall assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE). If such hazards are present, or likely to be present, the employer shall: Establishment: The employer had not assessed the workplace to determine the necessitate and appropriate types of personal protective equipment (PPE) for the employees.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1200 E
- Issued
- Apr 25, 2012
- Abate by
- May 25, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e): The employer had not established and implemented a written hazard communication program. Establishment: The employer had not established and implemented a written hazard communication program where employees were required to work with chemicals, such as (but not limited to) the propane.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Colony Hardware Corporation
View Colony Hardware Corporation's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 423710)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 332801638.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.