HOUSTON, TX ·
OSHA Inspection: DECO PLASTICS, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of DECO PLASTICS, INC. in 1519 HILL RD, HOUSTON, TX 77039 (NAICS 332710). OSHA activity number 332833813.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- DECO PLASTICS, INC.
- Site address
- 1519 HILL RD
- City
- HOUSTON
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 77039
- Mailing
- 1519 HILL RD, HOUSTON, TX 77039
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332710
- Employees
- 15
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.147 C01
- Issued
- Apr 12, 2012
- Abate by
- Apr 26, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $4,200
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of energy control procedures, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performs any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative. The employer does not ensure that a program consisting of energy control procedures, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performs any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative is established. This violation occurred on or about March 12, 2012, in the machine shop where employees were allowed to perform service and/or maintenance including set-up on vertical turret lathes, manual lathes, vertical mills, and surface grinders. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that a program consisting of energy control procedures, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performs any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative in the workplace.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $4200
1904.29 A
- Issued
- Apr 12, 2012
- Abate by
- Apr 26, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $600 · Current $600
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.29(a): The employer did not use OSHA 300, 300-A, and 301 forms, or equivalent forms, for recordable injuries and illnesses. The employer does not use OSHA 300, 300-A, and 301 forms, or equivalent forms, for recording injuries and illnesses. This violation occurred on or about March 21, 2012, and times prior thereto, where the employer had injuires requiring medical treatment and did not document the injuries using an OSHA 300, 300-A, and 301, or its equivalent. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that OSHA forms 300, 300-A, and 301, or its equivalent or used to document recordable injuries in the workplace.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (O) $600
1910.178 L06
- Issued
- Apr 12, 2012
- Abate by
- Apr 26, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): Certification. The employer did not certify that each operator had been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l). The certification shall include the name of the operator, the date of the training, the date of the evaluation, and the identity of the person(s) performing the training or evaluation. The employer does not certify operators in the safe operation of powered industrial trucks. This violation occurred on or about March 21, 2012, in the machine shop area where employees, who were operating a Yale forklift, were not certified in writing to identify the name of the operator, the date of the training, the date of the evaluation, and the identity of the person(s) performing the training or evaluation. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that powered industrial truck operators are certified in writing that includes the name of the operator, the date of the training, the date of the evaluation, and the identity of the person(s) performing the training or evaluation in the workplace.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections at Deco Plastics, INC.
View Deco Plastics, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332710)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 332833813.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.