HOUSTON, TX ·
OSHA Inspection: DECO PLASTICS, INC.
Follow-up inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a follow-up health inspection of DECO PLASTICS, INC. in 1519 HILL RD, HOUSTON, TX 77039 (NAICS 333220). OSHA activity number 339141244.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- DECO PLASTICS, INC.
- Site address
- 1519 HILL RD
- City
- HOUSTON
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 77039
- Mailing
- 1519 HILL RD, HOUSTON, TX 77039
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Follow-up (F)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 333220
- Employees
- 8
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.22 A01
- Issued
- Jul 17, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,760 · Current $1,760
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(1): All places of employment, passageways, storerooms or service rooms were not kept clean and orderly or in a sanitary condition. The employer does not ensure that all places of employment are kept in a clean and orderly condition. This violation occurred on or about June 20, 2012, in the machining area where an accumulation of plastic shavings was piled up on the floor exposing employees to fire hazards. Pursuant to 29 C.F. R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that all places of employment are kept in a clean and orderly condition.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $1760
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Jul 17, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 1, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,080 · Current $3,080
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: The employer does not ensure that machine guarding is provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation and rotating parts. a) This violation occurred on or about June 20, 2013, in the machining area where employees were exposed to caught-in hazards when operating the Dashin Prince 12 x 42 lathe (SN 2167) without a guard over the chuck. b) This violation occurred on or about June 20, 2013, near the CNC router area where employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when operating a shop built band saw without a guard over the blade. c) This violation occurred on or about June 20, 2013, near the panel saw area where employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when operating the Delta table saw (SN JF6470) without a guard over the blade. d) This violation occurred on or about June 20, 2013, in the panel saw area where employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when operating a shop built panel saw that was not equipped with a guard that enclosed that portion of the blade above the table. Pursuant to 29 C.F. R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that machine guarding is provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation and rotating parts.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $3080
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Jul 17, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 1, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,760 · Current $1,760
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: The employer does not ensure that a written hazard communication program is developed. This violation occurred on or about June 20, 2013, at the facility where employees were exposed to fire, inhalation and contact hazards when using chemicals such as, but not limited to, MC-Bond (acrylic cement), Weld-On 3, Weld-On 4, Weld-On 16 and PVC cement without developing a written program. Pursuant to 29 C.F. R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that a written hazard communication program is developed.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $1760
1910.1200 F05 I
- Issued
- Jul 17, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 1, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,760 · Current $1,760
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(i): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the identity of the hazardous chemical(s) contained therein: The employer does not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace is labeled with the identity of the hazardous chemical. a) This violation occurred on or about June 20, 2013, on the CNC Router work table where employees were exposed to fire, inhalation and contact hazards when using the following containers that were not labeled with the identity of its contents: 1) Needle tip applicator bottle 2) Applicator bottle 3) Spray bottle b) This violation occurred on or about June 20, 2013, in the Inspection area where employees were exposed to fire, inhalation and contact hazards when using the following containers that were not labeled with the identity of its contents: 1) Needle tip applicator bottle 2) Six ounce applicator bottle Pursuant to 29 C.F. R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace is labeled with the identity of the hazardous chemical.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $1760
1910.1200 F05 II
- Issued
- Jul 17, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 1, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the appropriate hazard warnings: The employer does not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace is labeled with the appropriate hazard warnings. a) This violation occurred on or about June 20, 2013, on the CNC Router work table where employees were exposed to fire, inhalation and contact hazards when using the following containers that were not labeled with hazard warnings: 1) Needle tip applicator bottle 2) Applicator bottle 3) Spray bottle b) This violation occurred on or about June 20, 2013, in the Inspection area where employees were exposed to fire, inhalation and contact hazards when using the following containers that were not labeled with hazard warnings: 1) Needle tip applicator bottle 2) Six ounce applicator bottle Pursuant to 29 C.F. R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace is labeled with the appropriate hazard warnings.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1200 G01
- Issued
- Jul 17, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 1, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,760 · Current $1,760
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): The employer did not have a material safety data sheet for each hazardous chemical in use: The employer does not ensure that material safety data sheets (MSDSs) for each hazardous chemical used are maintained. This violation occurred on or about June 20, 2013, at the facility where employees were exposed to fire, inhalation and contact hazards when using chemicals such as, but not limited to, Sparkle Glass Cleaner, Weld-On 3, and PVC cement without maintaining MSDSs. Pursuant to 29 C.F. R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that material safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical used are maintained.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $1760
1910.147 C04 I
- Issued
- Jul 17, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 1, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section: The employer does not ensure that procedures are documented for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees are engaged in activities covered by this section. This violation occurred on or about June 20, 2013, at the facility where employees perform set-up and/or maintenance tasks on CNC routers and vacuum formers without written procedures to de-energize the equipment. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that procedures are documented for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees are engaged in activities covered by this section.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (O) $0
1910.305 G02 III
- Issued
- Jul 17, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(iii): Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that tension would not be transmitted to joints or terminal screws: The employer does not ensure that flexible cords are connected to devices and fittings so that tension is not transmitted to joints or terminal screws. This violation was observed on or about June 20, 2013, in the panel saw area where a flexible cable to the panel saw was pulled from the strain relief exposing insulated conductor wires. Pursuant to 29 C.F. R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that flexible cords are connected to devices and fittings so that tension is not transmitted to joints or terminal screws.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections at Deco Plastics, INC.
View Deco Plastics, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 333220)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339141244.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.