Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: ATLAS IRON WORKS

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ATLAS IRON WORKS in 4020 GERALDINE AVENUE, SAINT LOUIS, MO 63115 (NAICS 332312). OSHA activity number 332838473.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Atlas Iron Works for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Atlas Iron Works is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ATLAS IRON WORKS
Site address
4020 GERALDINE AVENUE
City
SAINT LOUIS
State
MO
ZIP
63115
Mailing
4020 GERALDINE AVENUE, SAINT LOUIS, MO 63115
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Union (A)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332312
Employees
22
Ownership type
Private (A)

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 30, 2012
Abate by
Oct 15, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,800 · Current $1,260 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1):     A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:    On or about 03/15/2012, the employer had not developed a written respiratory protection program for employees who are required to wear a Sperian 3225 Premier Plus half-mask respirator, while engaged in painting operations.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1260
  • · Z (S) $1800

1910.134 E02 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 30, 2012
Abate by
Sep 5, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(2)(i):     The employer did not identify a physician or other licensed health care professional (PLHCP) to perform medical evaluations using a medical questionnaire or an initial medical examination that obtained the same information as the medical questionnaire:      On or about 03/15/2012, employee(s) engaged in painting operations were not provided a medical evaluation prior to being required to wear a Sperian 3225 Premier Plus half-mask respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 1 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 30, 2012
Abate by
Sep 5, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2):    The employer did not ensure that an employee using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator was fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator facepiece (size, style, model or make) was used and at least annually thereafter:    On or about 03/15/2012 employee(s) engaged in painting operations, were not fit tested.  Employee is required to wear Sperian 3225 Premier Plus half-mask respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 5 12 exposed
Issued
Aug 30, 2012
Abate by
Oct 15, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $1,680 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1):     The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative:    On or about 03/15/2012, a written Lockout/Tagout program had not been developed/implemented for employees engaged in maintenance operations to service equipment such as, but not limited to, Pipe Notcher,  Cold Saw, and Angle Line.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1680
  • · Z (S) $2400

1910.178 P01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 30, 2012
Abate by
Sep 7, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $1,680 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1):     Powered industrial truck(s) found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe had not been  taken out of service until restored to safe operating condition(s):    1/.  A White forklift, illegible Model #, was being operated by employees without a seatbelt and an inoperable backup alarm.    2/.  A Clark forklift ,  Model #C500Y580, Serial #Y685-0017-8715, was being operated by employees with an inoperable back-up alarm.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1680
  • · Z (S) $2400

1910.303 E01 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Aug 30, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,800 · Current $1,260 Reduced
29  CFR 1910.303(e)(1)(ii):    Markings were not provided on electrical equipment giving voltage, current, wattage, and other ratings as necessary:    On or about 03/15/2012, southwest wall in shop area, 240 volt disconnect switch for Transfer Table was not marked with voltage.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1260
  • · Z (S) $1800

1910.303 F01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Aug 30, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.303(f)(1):     Each disconnecting means required by Subpart S of Part 1910 for motors and appliances was not legibly marked to indicate its purpose, nor located and arranged so the purpose was evident:    On or about 03/15/2012, the disconnect switch for the Transfer Table, 240 volts, was not properly marked to indicate specific equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.334 A02 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Aug 30, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.334(a)(2)(ii):     There was a defect or evidence of damage that could have exposes an employee to injury and the defective or damaged item was not removed from service and an employee was using it before repairs and tests necessary to render the equipment safe were made:    On or about 03/15/2012, at the center bay area of the shop, a fan with an illegible model/serial number had a cord with outer insulation damage, and had not been removed from service.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Aug 30, 2012
Abate by
Sep 21, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,800 · Current $1,260 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e):     The employer did not develop, implemented, and/or maintain at the workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g),  and (h) will be met:    On or about 03/15/2012, a written Hazard Communication Program had not been developed for employees engaged in painting, detailing, fitting, and welding operations.  Employer uses such products as, but not limited to, Welding Wires, Grinding Wheels, and Steel Spec Universal Gray Primer.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1260
  • · Z (S) $1800

1910.157 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Aug 30, 2012
Abate by
Aug 31, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1):     Portable fire extinguishers were not mounted, located and identified so that they were readily accessible without subjecting the employees to injuries:    On or about 03/15/2012, at the north wall of the shop area, an ABC fire extinguisher was blocked by an open door and paint shaker machine.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

View Atlas Iron Works's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 332838473.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.