WOOSTER, OH —
OSHA Inspection: STAHL SCOTT FETZER COMPANY
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of STAHL SCOTT FETZER COMPANY in 3201 W OLD LINCOLN WAY, WOOSTER, OH 44691 (NAICS 336120). OSHA activity number 333292571.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- STAHL SCOTT FETZER COMPANY
- Site address
- 3201 W OLD LINCOLN WAY
- City
- WOOSTER
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 44691
- Mailing
- 3201 W OLD LINCOLN WAY, WOOSTER, OH 44691
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 336120
- Employees
- 94
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.147 C01
- Issued
- Jun 15, 2012
- Abate by
- Jul 15, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $2,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative: On or before 4/3/12, the employer did not establish a program to protect employees involved with servicing and maintenance of machines and equipment from the unexpected energizing, start up, or release of stored energy. Energy sources included, but are not limited to, electrical, pneumatic, hydraulic, etc. The company maintains and services equipment such as, but not limited to, press brakes, lasers, shears, turret presses, etc.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $2000
- — C (S) $4000
- — Z (S) $4000
1910.151 B
- Issued
- Jun 15, 2012
- Abate by
- Jul 15, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $6,000 · Current $3,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.151(b): There was neither an infirmary, clinic, or hospital used for the treatment of all injured employees in near proximity to the workplace nor a person or persons adequately trained to render first aid: The facility is located in a township where the EMS/Fire is volunteer and the response time would be outside of 5 minutes. No one at the facility is trained in first aid.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $3000
- — C (S) $6000
- — Z (S) $6000
1910.1030 C01 I
- Issued
- Jun 15, 2012
- Abate by
- Jul 15, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(i): The employer having employee(s) with an occupational exposure did not establish a written Exposure Control Plan designated to eliminate or minimize employee exposure: The employer didn't havde a written bloodborne program for employees who are to respond to medical emergencies.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.157 G02
- Issued
- Jun 15, 2012
- Abate by
- Jul 15, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $3,000 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(2): The educational program to familiarize employees with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting was not provided to all employees upon initial employment, and at least annually thereafter: The employer did not train employees on the use of portable fire extinguishers for those employees expected to fight incipient stage fires. NOTE: The employer may exercise one of the following options: 1) Provide portable fire extinguishers as specified in 29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1), meet the distribution requirements per 29 CFR 1910.157(d) (75 to the nearest extinguisher for Class A fires and 50 to the nearest extinguisher for Class B fires), and provide training and education for all employees in the use of such equipment and the hazards associated with incipient stage fire fighting as required in 29 CFR 1910.157(g). The other sections of 29 CFR 1910.157 also apply. 2) Provide extinguishers as specified in 29 CFR 1910.157(c) (1), designate certain employees to be the only employees authorized to use such equipment and require all other employees to immediately evacuate upon the sounding of the fire alarm, establish this in writing in an emergency action plan as outlined in 29 CFR 1910.38(c) and train/educate designated employees per 1910.157(g). Utilizing this option exempts the employer from distribution requirements of 29 CFR 1910.157(d). 3) Establish a written fire safety policy which requires the immediate and total evacuation of employees from the workplace upon the sounding of a fire alarm signal. This policy includes an emergency action plan and a fire prevention plan as specified in 29 CFR 1910.38(a) and (b). Utilizing this option exempts the employer from the requirements of 1910.157 to include the need for providing portable fire equipment unless a specific standard requires that a portable fire extinguisher be provided (such as those requirements in 29 CFR 1910.106/107 relating to use/storage of flammable/combustible liquids). If extinguishers are provided but not intended for employee use, 29 CFR 1910.157(a) and (f) are still applicable (inspection, maintenance and testing of equipment).
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1500
- — C (S) $3000
- — Z (S) $3000
1910.178 L01 I
- Issued
- Jun 15, 2012
- Abate by
- Jul 15, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $2,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not provide training and evaluation for powered industrial truck operators: Operators were not trained in the safe use of powered industrial trucks. Training shall consist of a combination of formal instruction (e.g., lecture, interactive computer learning, video tape, written maerial), practical training (demonstrations performed by the trainer and practical exercises performed by the trainee), and evaluation of the operator's performance in the workplace.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $2000
- — C (S) $4000
- — Z (S) $4000
1910.179 J02
- Issued
- Jun 15, 2012
- Abate by
- Jul 15, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $3,000 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(2): An inspection program for cranes in regular use, with an inspection frequency of daily to monthly intervals, was not established: On or before 4/3/12, the employer did not have a daily to monthly inspection program in place for their 1-ton and 2-ton overhead gantry cranes at the facility.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1500
- — C (S) $3000
- — Z (S) $3000
1910.179 J03
- Issued
- Jun 15, 2012
- Abate by
- Jul 15, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(3): A complete periodic inspection of crane(s) had not been conducted in the past 12 months: The employer had not had an annual crane inspection done for their cranes in the facility.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.212 A03 II
- Issued
- Jun 15, 2012
- Abate by
- Jun 29, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $70,000 · Current $50,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s): (a) The Chicago press brake, operated by foot pedal, did not have any point of operation guarding. (b) The Wysong press brake, operated by foot pedal, was inadequately guarded. The light curtains for the press brake were not adjusted properly to prevent the employee from having any part of their body in the danger zone during the operating cycle.
Recent events (3)
- — F (W) $50000
- — C (W) $70000
- — Z (W) $70000
More inspections at Stahl Scott Fetzer Company
View Stahl Scott Fetzer Company's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 336120)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 333292571.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.