Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: ICS, INC.

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of ICS, INC. in 210 N. ELDER, MCPHERSON, KS 67460 (NAICS 332813). OSHA activity number 333295137.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch ICS, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for ICS, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ICS, INC.
Site address
210 N. ELDER
City
MCPHERSON
State
KS
ZIP
67460
Mailing
210 N. ELDER, MCPHERSON, KS 67460
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332813
Employees
10
Ownership type
Private (A)

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.124 G02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 20, 2012
Abate by
Oct 2, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,700 · Current $1,190 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.124(g)(2): When your employees work with liquids that may burn, irritate, or otherwise harm their skin, you must provide an emergency shower and eye-wash station close to the dipping or coating operation. In place of this equipment, you may use a water hose that is at least 4 feet (1.22 m) long and at least \3/4\ of an inch (18 mm) thick with a quick-opening valve and carrying a pressure of 25 pounds per square inch (1.62 k/cm2) or less:    In the dip tank area, an eye wash facility capable of supplying continuous flow for 15 minutes was not provided for flushing of the eyes.  Corrosive chemicals such as chromic acid and sulfuric acid were used in the area, exposing employees to chemical burns to the eyes.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1190
  • · Z (S) $1700

1910.146 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 20, 2012
Abate by
Sep 19, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,360 · Current $952 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(1): The employer shall evaluate the workplace to determine if any spaces are permit-required confined spaces:    An evaluation of all workplaces was not conducted to determine if the spaces were permit-required confined spaces such as dip tanks. Employees were exposed to chemicals from entering a confined space.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $952
  • · Z (S) $1360

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 20, 2012
Abate by
Sep 19, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,360 · Current $952 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are-barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices,electronic safety devices, etc.:    The employee operating the retrofitted Cincinnati lathe was exposed to hazards associated with rotating parts in that a chuck guard was not provided.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $952
  • · Z (S) $1360

1910.252 C13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 20, 2012
Abate by
Sep 19, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,360 · Current $952 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.252(c)(13): First-aid equipment. First-aid equipment shall be available at all times. All injuries shall be reported as soon as possible for medical attention. First aid shall be rendered until medical attention can be provided:    There were no designated first-aid trained personnel at the facility to render first aid until medical attention could be provided for welding employees. Welding employees were exposed to burns and other hazards associated with welding.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $952
  • · Z (S) $1360

1910.1025 E01 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 20, 2012
Abate by
Oct 16, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,700 · Current $1,190 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1025(e)(1)(ii): Where any employee is exposed to lead above the permissible exposure limit, but for 30 days or less per year, the employer shall implement engineering controls to reduce exposures to 200 ug/m(3), but thereafter may implement any combination of engineering, work practice (including administrative controls), and respiratory controls to reduce and maintain employee exposure to lead to or below 50 ug/m(3):    On or about May 3, 2012, a production plater was exposed to lead in excess of the permissible exposure limit (PEL).  Sampling performed on May 3, 2012 for a 469 minute sampling period, with zero exposure assumed for the unsampled 11 minute period of time, revealed exposure levels to lead to be 13 ug/m3.  The employee's exposure was 2.5 times the PEL of 5 ug/m3.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1190
  • · Z (S) $1700

1910.1025 E03 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 20, 2012
Abate by
Sep 19, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1025(e)(3)(i): Each employer shall establish and implement a written compliance program to reduce exposures to or below the permissible exposure limit, and interim levels if applicable, solely by means of engineering and work practice controls in accordance with the implementation schedule in paragraph (e)(1):    A written compliance program to include information contained in 1910.1025(e)(3)(ii)(B) through 1910.1025(e)(ii)(H) of this section  was not developed or implemented to reduce employees exposure level to below the permissible exposure limit for lead.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1026 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 20, 2012
Abate by
Sep 19, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,700 · Current $1,190 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1026(c): The employer shall ensure that no employee is exposed to an airborne concentration of chromium (VI) in excess of 5 micrograms per cubic meter of air (5 g/m3), calculated as an 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA):    On or about May 3, 2012, a polishing employee was exposed to hexavalent chromium in excess of the permissible exposure limit (PEL).  Sampling performed on May 3, 2012 for a 473 minute sampling period, with zero exposure assumed for the unsampled 7 minute period of time, revealed exposure levels to hexavalent chromium to be 7.9 ug/m3.  The employee's exposure was 1.5 times the PEL of 5 ug/m3.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1190
  • · Z (S) $1700

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 20, 2012
Abate by
Oct 2, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): The employer shall ensure that an employee using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator is fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator facepiece (size, style, model or make) is used, and at least annually thereafter:    The polishing employee using a Zee filtering facepiece respirator was exposed to respiratory hazards in that the employee was not fit tested initially and annually thereafter.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1030 C02 I A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 20, 2012
Abate by
Sep 19, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(2)(i)(A): Each employer who has an employee(s) with occupational exposure as defined by paragraph (b) of this section shall prepare an exposure determination. This exposure determination shall contain a list of all job classifications in which all employees in those job classifications have occupational exposure:    The exposure control plan did not contain a list of the job classifications in which employees have exposure to bloodborne pathogens such as first aid responders.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

View ICS, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 333295137.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.