TRUMBULL, CT —
OSHA Inspection: BARON TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of BARON TECHNOLOGY, INC. in 62 SPRING HILL ROAD, TRUMBULL, CT 06611 (NAICS 332812). OSHA activity number 334140423.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BARON TECHNOLOGY, INC.
- Site address
- 62 SPRING HILL ROAD
- City
- TRUMBULL
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06611
- Mailing
- 62 SPRING HILL ROAD, TRUMBULL, CT 06611
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332812
- Employees
- 43
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Jul 11, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 10, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE): WORKSHOP: The employer had not assessed the workplace to determine the necessitate and appropriate types of personal protective equipment (PPE) for the employees.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1960
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.132 F01
- Issued
- Jul 11, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 10, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(f)(1): The employer did not provide training to each employee who was required by this section to use personal protective equipment: WORKSHOP: The employer had not trained all the employees on the Workplace Hazard Assessment for personal protective equipment (PPE).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Jul 11, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 10, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: WORKSHOP: The employer had not established and implemented a written hazard worksite-specific respiratory protection program and procedures consisting of employee training, proper selection, fit testing, and medical evaluations where employees were required to wear half face piece cartridge respirators, worn by employees during the tasks, such as (but not limited to) sanding and buffing.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1960
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.134 K01
- Issued
- Jul 11, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1): The employer did not ensure that each employee can demonstrate knowledge of items in (i)-(vii) WORKSHOP: The employer did not ensure through providing appropriate training and evaluation that the employees who were required to wear half facepiece cartridge respirators during the tasks, such as (but not limited to) sanding and buffing operations were acquire necessary knowledges.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Jul 11, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 10, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: WORKSHOP: The employees, required to wear the half face piece cartridge respirators during the tasks, such as (but not limited to) sanding and buffing had not been medically evaluated for their ability prior to the employees wearing the respirator.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1960
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Jul 11, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 10, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: WORKSHOP: The employees, required to wear half facepiece cartridge respirators during the tasks, such as (but not limited to) sanding/buffing had not been fit tested prior to initial wear.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Jul 11, 2012
- Abate by
- Jul 14, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,450 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Machine guarding was not provided to protect operator(s) and other employees from hazard(s) created by rotating parts: WORKSHOP: The end nuts of the Baldor pedestal polishers and buffers were unguarded. ABATED DURING THE INSPECTION.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2450
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.219 D01
- Issued
- Jul 11, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 10, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(d)(1): Pulley(s) with part(s) seven feet or less from the floor or work platform were not guarded in accordance with the requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o): WORKSHOP: : The pulleys of the following grinders were unguarded: 1. Leeson grinder. 2. Burr King grinder.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1960
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.219 E01 I
- Issued
- Jul 11, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 10, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(e)(1)(i): Where both runs of horizontal belts are seven (7) feet or less from the floor level, the guard shall extend to at least fifteen (15) inches above the belt or to a standard height, except that where both runs of a horizontal belt are 42 inches or less from the floor, the belt shall be fully enclosed in accordance with paragraphs (m) and (o) of this section. WORKSHOP: : The horizontal belts of the following grinders were unguarded: 1. Leeson grinder. 2. Burr King grinder.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.219 C02 I
- Issued
- Jul 11, 2012
- Abate by
- Jul 14, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,450 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(c)(2)(i): All exposed part(s) of horizontal shafting seven (7) feet or less from floor or working platform were not protected by stationary casing(s) enclosing shafting completely or by trough(s) enclosing sides and top or sides and bottom of shafting: WORKSHOP: The horizontal shafts of the Baldor polishers and buffers were unguarded. ABATED DURING THE INSPECTION.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2450
- — Z (S) $3500
More inspections at Baron Technology, INC.
View Baron Technology, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332812)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 334140423.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.