Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: BARON TECHNOLOGY, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of BARON TECHNOLOGY, INC. in 9 MAPLE DRIVE, MONROE, CT 06468 (NAICS 332812). OSHA activity number 343029054.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Baron Technology, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Baron Technology, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
9 MAPLE DRIVE
City
MONROE
State
CT
ZIP
06468
Mailing
62 SPRING HILL RD., TRUMBULL, CT 06611
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332812
Employees
22
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.107 D09

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 16, 2018
Abate by
Aug 20, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,880 · Current $2,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.107(d)(9): Air exhaust from spray operations was not be directed so that it will contaminate makeup air being introduced into the spraying area or other ventilating intakes, nor directed so as to create a nuisance. Air exhausted from spray operations shall not be recirculated.      Location: 62 Spring Hill Road, Trumbull, CT 06611     Spray Room:  The ductless spray booth Model # S-330-DSH did not exhaust/vent outside the building when F/A Sealer 789 a highly flammable toxic material was sprayed in a small spray room.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2400
  • — Z (S) $3880

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 16, 2018
Abate by
Aug 20, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,880 · Current $2,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use;     Location: 62 Spring Hill Road, Trumbull, CT 06611    The employers written respiratory program was not site specific and did not include the company name, Program Administrator and types of respirators utilized.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2400
  • — Z (S) $3880

1910.134 C03

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jul 16, 2018
Abate by
Aug 20, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(3): The employer did not designate a program administrator who was qualified by appropriate training or experience to administer or oversee the respiratory protection program and to conduct the required evaluations of program effectiveness:    Location: 62 Spring Hill Road, Trumbull, CT 06611  The respiratory program did not have a Program Administrator and had not been evaluated for its program effectiveness.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 16, 2018
Abate by
Aug 20, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,880 · Current $2,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):    Location: 62 Spring Hill Road Trumbull, CT 06611    Each employee are required to wear a half face negative pressure tight fitting respirator was not provided with fit testing.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2400
  • — Z (S) $3880

1910.134 G01 I A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 16, 2018
Abate by
Aug 20, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function:   Location: 62 Spring Hill Road, Trumbull, CT 06611   Each employee required to wear a half face negative tight fitting pressure respirator was not clean shaven and had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the face piece and the employee's face.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 16, 2018
Abate by
Aug 20, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary:   Location: 62 Spring Hill Road, Trumbull, CT 06611  Annual respiratory protection training was not provided to each to employee.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.138 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 16, 2018
Abate by
Aug 20, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,880 · Current $2,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.138(a): The employer did not select and require employee(s) to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances; severe cuts or lacerations; severe abrasion; punctures; chemical burns; thermal burns; and harmful temperature extremes     Location: 62 Spring Hill Road Trumbull, CT     Each employee changing propane tanks on the powered industrial trucks were not provided with appropriate hand protection (cold-impervious insulating gloves).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2400
  • — Z (S) $3880

1910.178 A06

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 16, 2018
Abate by
Aug 20, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,880 · Current $2,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(6): The employer did not ensure that all nameplates and markings were in place:     Location: 62 Spring Hill Road, Trumbull, CT 06611    The name plate on the Hyster power industrial truck serial number A10D350624 was painted over and not legible.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2400
  • — Z (S) $3880

1910.178 L04 III

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 16, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years:  Location: 62 Spring Hill Road Trumbull, CT 06611  The Hyster and Komatsu power industrial truck operators were not evaluated at least once every three years.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 P01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 16, 2018
Abate by
Aug 20, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): Powered industrial truck(s) found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe had not been taken out of service until restored to safe operating condition(s).   Location: 62 Spring Hill Road, Trumbull, CT 06611  The horn on the Hyster FG25T-8 was not operational.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Baron Technology, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343029054.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.