Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: LUSA CONSTRUCTION INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of LUSA CONSTRUCTION INC. in 531 POST AVENUE, POLE #60478LH, LYNDHURST, NJ 07071 (NAICS 237110). OSHA activity number 334251949.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Lusa Construction INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Lusa Construction INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
531 POST AVENUE, POLE #60478LH
City
LYNDHURST
State
NJ
ZIP
07071
Mailing
52 PORETE AVENUE, NORTH ARLINGTON, NJ 07031
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
237110
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.651 C02

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 22, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.651(c)(2):     A stairway, ladder, ramp or other safe means of egress was not located in trench excavations that were 4 feet (1.22m) or more in depth so as to require no more than 25 feet (7.62m) of lateral travel for employees:    a)  Roadway:  A ladder or other safe means of egress was not located in the excavation that was more that four feet deep, on or about 5/10/2012.
Recent events (3)
  • — C (S) $2800
  • — F (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.651 K01

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 22, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.651(k)(1):     Daily inspections of excavations, the adjacent areas, and protective systems were not made by a competent person for evidence of a situation that could have resulted in possible cave-ins, indications of failure of protective systems, hazardous atmospheres, or other hazardous conditions:    a)  Excavation Area:  A competent person was not on site to make inspections as needed throughout the shift, on or about 5/10/2012.    Abatement note:  To be a "competent person" under this standard, a person must have had training in, and be knowledgeable about, soils analysis, the use of protective systems and the requirements of this standard.
Recent events (3)
  • — C (S) $2800
  • — F (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.652 C02 III

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 22, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.652(c)(2)(iii):     Manufacturer's specifications, recommendations, and limitations, and manufacturer's approval to deviate from the specifications, recommendations, and limitations were not in written form at the jobsite during construction of the protective system, and a copy was not made available to the Secretary upon request:    a)  Throughout Site:  The tabulated data for the Efficiency Production, Inc. hydraulic aluminum shoring was not on site and available, on or about 5/10/2012.
Recent events (3)
  • — C (S) $2800
  • — F (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.652 D02

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 22, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.652(d)(2):     Manufactured materials and equipment used for protective systems were not used and maintained in a manner that was consistent with the recommendations of the manufacturer:    a)  Excavation Area:  The Efficiency Production, Inc. hydraulic aluminum shoring, protective system, was not used in accordance with the manufacturers tabulated data, on or about 5/10/2012.    The faces of the excavation were not straight and near vertical.    The shoring members did not bear on firm soil or solid filler.   The soil was not able to stand with unsupported vertical sidewalls long enough for shoring installation.   Trenches exceeding 8 ft. in length did not have a minimum of 3 shores spaced according to the tables.
Recent events (3)
  • — C (S) $0
  • — F (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Lusa Construction INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 334251949.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.