Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: J.I. MORGAN, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of J.I. MORGAN, INC. in 201 HWY 95, NEW MEADOWS, ID 83654 (NAICS 113310). OSHA activity number 334288917.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch J.I. Morgan, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for J.I. Morgan, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
J.I. MORGAN, INC.
Site address
201 HWY 95
City
NEW MEADOWS
State
ID
ZIP
83654
Mailing
P.O. BOX D, NEW MEADOWS, ID 83654
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
113310
Employees
30
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1904.7 B03

Other-than-serious 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
Oct 29, 2012
Abate by
Nov 1, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1904.7(b)(3):     How do I record a work-related injury or illness that results in days away from work? When an injury or illness involves one or more days away from work, you must record the injury or illness on the OSHA 300 Log with a check mark in the space for cases involving days away and an entry of the number of calendar days away from work in the number of days column. If the employee is out for an extended period of time, you must enter an estimate of the days that the employee will be away, and update the day count when the actual number of days is known.    a) For the calendar year 2011 OSHA record keeping log case # 1, the employer did not record any days away for a case classified as one with days away.    Note: Abatement certification is required.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.147 C04 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 29, 2012
Abate by
Dec 30, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i):     Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in the activities covered by this section.     a) In the Shop, on or about May 9, 2012, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not have an implemented or complete lock out/ tag out program for equipment such as Yarders, skidders, dozers, loaders, log trucks, lathe, milling machine.    Note: Abatement certification is required.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.147 C06 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 29, 2012
Abate by
Dec 30, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(ii):     The employer did not certify that a periodic/annual inspection of lock out tag out procedures had been performed    a) In the Shop, on or about May 9, 2012, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not certify the completion of at least an annual review of lock out/ tag out procedures.    Note: Abatement certification is required.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.147 C07 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 29, 2012
Abate by
Dec 30, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i):     The employer did not provide training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program was understood by employees and that the knowledge and skills required for the safe application, usage, and removal of the energy controls were acquired by employees.     a) In the Shop, on or about  May 9, 2012, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not provide training and/or instructions to employees (affected, authorized or other) in the requirements of the standard.    Note: Abatement certification is required.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.215 B09

Other-than-serious 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 29, 2012
Abate by
Oct 30, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9):     The distance between the wheel periphery and the adjustable tongue or the end of the peripheral member at the top was greater than one-fourth inch:    a) In the shop on or about May 09, 2012, and at times prior thereto, the tongue guard on the Chicago Industry bench grinder, model 750 3/4 HP was 3/4 Inch from the 7 inch wheel.     b) In the shop on or about May 09, 2012, and at times prior thereto, the tongue guard on the Delta bench grinder, 4/5 HP was ? inch from the 8 inch wheel.    Note: Abatement certification is required.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.244 A01 II

Other-than-serious 7 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 29, 2012
Abate by
Dec 14, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.244(a)(1)(ii):     The rated load was not legibly and permanently marked in a prominent location on the jack by casting, stamping, or other suitable means.    a) In the Shop, on or about May 9, 2012, and at times prior thereto, the Big Red Air over hydraulic jack lacked load rating marks.    b) In the Shop, on or about May 9, 2012, and at times prior thereto, the Northern jack lacked load rating marks.    c) In the Shop, on or about May 9, 2012, and at times prior thereto, the Oraange Air over hydraulic jack lacked load rating marks.    d) In the Shop, on or about May 9, 2012, and at times prior thereto, the Northern Bottle jack lacked load rating marks.    e) In the Shop, on or about May 9, 2012, and at times prior thereto, the NAPA bottle jack model 94-229 jack lacked load rating marks.    f) In the Shop, on or about May 9, 2012, and at times prior thereto, theNAPA Bottle jack model 791-6420 lacked load rating marks.    g) In the Shop, on or about May 9, 2012, and at times prior thereto, theYellow hydraulic jack Model G3AD132 lacked load rating marks.    Note: Abatement certification is required.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.244 A02 VI A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 29, 2012
Abate by
Dec 14, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.244(a)(2)(vi)(a):     Hydraulic jacks in constant or intermittent use at one locality were not inspected at least once every 6 months:    a) In the shop, on or about May 9, 2012, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not inspect, and document the results of the inspection on hydraulic bottle jacks, hydraulic floor jacks, and air over hydraulic jacks.    Note: Abatement certification is required.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.305 B01 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 29, 2012
Abate by
Nov 1, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(ii):     Unused openings in cabinets, boxes, and fittings were not effectively closed.    a) In the shop on or about May 09, 2012, and at times prior thereto, electrical  distribution panel A was missing three covers where circuit breakers belong.    Note: Abatement certification is required.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 29, 2012
Abate by
Dec 30, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):     Employer did not develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met, and which also includes the following:    a) In the Office and shop, on or about May 9, 2012, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not implement an effective hazard communication program to include chemicals such as fuels, lubricants, paints, brake shoes, and liquid petroleum gas.    Note: Abatement certification is required.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 29, 2012
Abate by
Dec 30, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i):     A list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present was not prepared using a product identifier that is referenced on the appropriate safety data sheet (the list may be compiled for the workplace as a whole or for individual work areas);    a) In the shop on or about May 09, 2012, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not have or maintain a list of chemicals found in the shop such as Oxygen, acetylene gas, carbon dioxide, cutting fluid, lubricating oils, brake shoes.    Note: Abatement certification is required.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View J.I. Morgan, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 334288917.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.