Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,201Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-31 Last loaded 2026-09-03

OSHA Inspection: ORBIS CORPORATION

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of ORBIS CORPORATION in 200 ELM STREET, URBANA, OH 43078 (NAICS 326199). OSHA activity number 334429735.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Orbis Corporation for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Orbis Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ORBIS CORPORATION
Site address
200 ELM STREET
City
URBANA
State
OH
ZIP
43078
Mailing
200 ELM STREET, URBANA, OH 43078
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
326199
Employees
314
Ownership type
Private (A)

9 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 300 exposed
Issued
Nov 15, 2012
Abate by
Feb 19, 2013
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $0 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1):    The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to dust explosion, deflagration, or other fire hazards as a result of working at or near a dust collection system and handling combustible plastic dust, which was not adequately designed to prevent or minimize employee exposure to explosion, deflagration and fire hazards:     a)   Plastic Grinding Department:  The indoor dust collection system used for collecting combustible plastic dust (high density polyethylene, polypropylene, and polypropylene copolymer) lacked means of explosion, deflagration and fire protection such as, but not limited to:     1) Explosion protection for the second stage cyclone.     2) Fire protection for the second stage cyclone.     3) Deflagration propagation protection (isolation) for the upstream, downstream, and material discharge orifices of the second stage cyclone.     4) Explosion protection for the first stage cyclone.     5) Fire protection for the first stage cyclone.     6) Deflagration propagation protection (isolation) for the upstream, downstream, and material discharge orifices of the first stage cyclone.     7) Prohibiting the passage of combustible particulate solids through air moving devices (positive pressure transfer fans) such as those located between the grinder and the first stage cyclone and between the first stage and second stage cyclones.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $5000
  • · Z (S) $5000

1910.22 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 100 exposed
Issued
Nov 15, 2012
Abate by
Dec 12, 2012
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $2,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(1): All places of employment, passageways, storerooms or service rooms were not kept clean and orderly or in a sanitary condition    a)  The plastic grinding department had flammable plastic dust located on beams, motor housings, floor, walls, dividers and electrical panels.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $2500
  • · C (S) $5000
  • · Z (S) $5000

1910.132 A

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Nov 15, 2012
Abate by
Jan 4, 2013
Penalty
Initial $6,000 · Current $3,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(a):     Protective equipment was not used when necessary whenever hazards capable of causing injury and impairment were encountered:    a) Employees who purge and do color changes on the plastic injection molding machines were not required to wear coverings for their foreamrs to protect them from burns.    b) On or about May 25, 2012 and employee using a torch to burn plastic off of plastic injection molding nozzels where fire was present was not wearing a flame retardant jacket to prevent burns to the arms and upper body.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $3000
  • · C (S) $6000
  • · Z (S) $6000

1910.146 C02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Nov 15, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $1,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(2):     The employer did not inform exposed employees, by posting danger signs or by any other equally effective means, of the existence and location of and the danger posed by the permit spaces:      (a) The well pit located at the far east side of the plant did not have a sign on it indicating it was a permit required confined space.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O) $1500
  • · C (S) $3000
  • · Z (S) $3000

1910.242 B

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 15, 2012
Abate by
Dec 5, 2012
Penalty
Initial $6,000 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.242(b):     Compressed air used for cleaning. Compressed air shall not be used for cleaning purposes except where reduced to less than 30 p.s.i. and then only with effective chip guarding and personal protective equipment.    A) Employees in the grinding departmnet were using compressed air to remove plastic dust from their bodies.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O) $2000
  • · C (S) $6000
  • · Z (S) $6000

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 300 exposed
Issued
Nov 15, 2012
Abate by
Dec 12, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2):     The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed through written certification that identified the workplace evaluated; the person certifying that the evaluation had been performed; the date(s) of the hazard assessment; and, identified the document as a certification of the hazard assessment      a) A written certification of a hazard assessment had not been completed by the employer.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O) $0
  • · C (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.134 K06

Other-than-serious 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 15, 2012
Abate by
Dec 5, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(6):  A copy of Appendix D was not provided to employees who wore respirators when such use was not required by this section or by the employer.       a)  The employer had not provided Appendix D of this standard to employees in the grinding department who voluntarily wore filtering face piece respirators when cleaning.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O) $0
  • · C (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.1020 G01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 314 exposed
Issued
Nov 15, 2012
Abate by
Dec 12, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1020(g)(1):     Upon an employee's first entering into employment, and at least annually thereafter, each employer shall inform current employees covered by this section the (1) existance, location and availability of any records covered, (2) person responsible for maintaining and providing access to the records, and (3) each employee's right of access to these records:    a) Employees had not been informed of their ability to access medical and exposure records covered by this section.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O) $0
  • · C (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.1200 F06 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Nov 15, 2012
Abate by
Dec 12, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6)(ii):     Product identifier and words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof, which provide at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals, and which, in conjunction with the other information immediately available to employees under the hazard communication program, will provide employees with the specific information regarding the physical and health hazards of the hazardous chemical.      a) The 20oz plastic bottle located in the maintenance area was not labeled with the identity or the hazard of the mineral oil contained therin, but instead with a coca cola label.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O) $0
  • · C (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

View Orbis Corporation's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 334429735.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.