DAYTONA BEACH, FL —
OSHA Inspection: DAYTONA FLEXIBLE PACKAGING, LLC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of DAYTONA FLEXIBLE PACKAGING, LLC in 811 FENTRESS COURT, DAYTONA BEACH, FL 32117 (NAICS 488991). OSHA activity number 334493038.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- DAYTONA FLEXIBLE PACKAGING, LLC
- Site address
- 811 FENTRESS COURT
- City
- DAYTONA BEACH
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 32117
- Mailing
- 811 FENTRESS COURT, DAYTONA BEACH, FL 32117
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 488991
- Employees
- 38
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.147 C04 I
- Issued
- Sep 4, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 25, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $2,601 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section: a. On or about May 23, 2012, the employer had not developed a procedure for the control of pneumatic and electric sources when maintining the filling machine, exposing employees to caught in hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2601
- — Z (S) $4200
1910.147 C07 I
- Issued
- Sep 4, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 25, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): The employer did not provide training to ensure: 1) that the purpose and function of the energy control program was understood by the employees and 2) that the knowledge and skills required for the safe application, usage and removal of the energy controls was acquired by the employees: a. On or about May 23, 2012, the employer had not trained authorized and affected employees on the procedures for the control of pneumatic and electric sources when maintining the filling machine, exposing employees to caught in hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.178 L01 II
- Issued
- Sep 4, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 25, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $2,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii): Prior to permitting an employee to operate a powered industrial truck (except for training purposes), the employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training required by this paragraph [Reference 29 CFR 1926.602(d) for construction]: a. On or about May 23, 2012, the employer had not verified that forklift operators had completed training and been evaluated, exposing employees to caught in and struck by hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2200
- — Z (S) $4200
1910.212 A03 II
- Issued
- Sep 4, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 7, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $2,600 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): The point of operation guards were not designed and constructed as to prevent the operator from having any part of their body in the danger zone during the operating cycle: a. On or about May 23, 2012, the employer had not provide a working guard for Filling Machine #1 (Mildred), exposing employees to a caught in hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2600
- — Z (S) $4200
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Sep 4, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 25, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: a. On or about May 23, 2012, the employer had not developed a hazard communication program, exposing employees to flammables such as but not limit to propane and pineapple flavoring.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $1000
- — Z (S) $4200
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Sep 4, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 25, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): The employer did not provide employees with effective information and training as specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(2) and (3) on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new physical or health hazard the employees had not previously been trained about was introduced into their work area: a. On or about May23, 2012, the leased employees had not been trained on the hazards associated with the products that they were exposed to, including but not limited to propane and pineapple flavoring.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Daytona Flexible Packaging, LLC
View Daytona Flexible Packaging, LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 488991)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 334493038.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.