LEESBURG, FL —
OSHA Inspection: AMTEX-NMS, INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of AMTEX-NMS, INC. in 2500 INDUSTRIAL ST., LEESBURG, FL 34748 (NAICS 332311). OSHA activity number 334520350.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- AMTEX-NMS, INC.
- Site address
- 2500 INDUSTRIAL ST.
- City
- LEESBURG
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 34748
- Mailing
- 2500 INDUSTRIAL ST., LEESBURG, FL 34748
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332311
- Employees
- 116
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.23 C01
- Issued
- Aug 7, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 14, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $4,950 · Current $2,970 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1): Open-sided floor(s) or platform(s) 4 feet or more above the adjacent floor or ground level were not guarded by standard railings (or the equivalent as specified in 29 CFR 1910.23(e)(3)(i) through (v)) on all open sides except where there is entrance to a ramp, stairway, or fixed ladder: a) on the property, outside the production building - employees worked on the roof of modular buildings without fall protection, exposing them to a 12-16ft fall hazard, observed on or about 5/14/12. Abatement Documentation Required
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2970
- — Z (S) $4950
1910.138 A
- Issued
- Aug 7, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 14, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,525 · Current $1,515 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.138(a): The employer did not select and require employees to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances: a) at the establishment - the use of hand protection was not required for employees who used chemicals including, but not limited to, Sikaflex, observed on or about 5/14/12.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1515
- — Z (S) $2525
1910.178 P01
- Issued
- Aug 7, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 17, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): Powered industrial truck(s) found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe had not been taken out of service until restored to safe operating condition(s) a) at the establishment - the Caterpillar GP50 forklift (serial #AT3350350) was operated with tires that were worn and had cracks, cuts and torn pieces of rubber, observed on or about 5/14/12. Abatement Documentation Required
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Amtex-Nms, INC.
View Amtex-Nms, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332311)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 334520350.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.