DEER PARK, TX —
OSHA Inspection: DIAMOND ERECTORS, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of DIAMOND ERECTORS, INC. in 4800 RAILROAD AVENUE, DEER PARK, TX 77536 (NAICS 238120). OSHA activity number 334528338.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- DIAMOND ERECTORS, INC.
- Site address
- 4800 RAILROAD AVENUE
- City
- DEER PARK
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 77536
- Mailing
- 2715 W. OAK, PASADENA, TX 77502
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238120
- Employees
- 20
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.350 A09
- Issued
- Jul 5, 2012
- Abate by
- Jul 6, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.350(a)(9): Compressed gas cylinder(s) were not secured in an upright position: At the site, two cyclinders used for welding, were not being used and kept on the ground, laying on their side, exposing them to physical damage and creating a struck-by hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $800
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.350 A10
- Issued
- Jul 5, 2012
- Abate by
- Jul 6, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.350(a)(10): Oxygen cylinders in storage were not separated from fuel-gas cylinder or combustible materials (especially oil or grease), a minimum distance of 20 feet or by a noncombustible barrier at least 5 feet high having a fire-resistance rating of at least one-half hour. At the site, an oxygen and acetylene cylinder had been lying on their side, together, for at least 2-3 days, exposing employees to explosion hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.416 E
- Issued
- Jul 5, 2012
- Abate by
- Jul 6, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $804 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.416(e): Employer did not ensure that cords and cables showing signs of wear and fraying were not used. At the site, employees were using a flexible cord to supply power to a drill (not double insulated) that showed signs of severe wear.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $804
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.502 D15
- Issued
- Jul 5, 2012
- Abate by
- Jul 10, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15): Anchorage used for attachment for personal fall arrest equipment was not capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee attached nor was it designed, installed and used as follows: As part of a complete personal fall arrest system which maintains a safety factor of at least two; and under the supervision of a qualified person. At the location, anchors and synthetic ropes were installed by employees who had not received training to do so and were directed by the supervisor (the qualified person), with ropes that were not in good condition, too long allowing the employee to hit the ground if a fall occurred, and employees were tied off to knots in the rope.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.503 A02
- Issued
- Jul 5, 2012
- Abate by
- Jul 6, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2): The employer did not assure that each employee exposed to fall hazards was trained by a competent person qualified in the areas specified in 29 CFR 1926.503 (a)(2)(i) through (viii) At the site, the employer did not assure that each employee engaged in work requiring fall protection was trained int he recognition of fall hazards and use of fall protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.760 A01
- Issued
- Jul 5, 2012
- Abate by
- Jul 10, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.760(a)(1): Each employee engaged in a steel erection activity who is on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge more than 15 feet (4.6 m) above a lower level was not protected from fall hazards by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, positioning device systems, or fall restraint systems. A) At the site, employees were walking the beams to access the decked area to reach the ground and were exposed to falls up to 25' or more. B)At the site, employees engaged in installing insulation under the roof, as part of the series of work for erecting a pre-fabricated metal building, were exposed to fall hazards because, while they were given PFAS and synthetic ropes to tie off to, the ropes, when extended, came to approximately 6' above the ground.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400
- — Z (S) $2800
More inspections at Diamond Erectors, INC.
View Diamond Erectors, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238120)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 334528338.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.