SAIPAN, MP —
OSHA Inspection: GINEN SAIPAN
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of GINEN SAIPAN in NEW SINGLE FAMILY TWO STORY RESIDENCE PROJECT SAN ROQUE, SAIPAN, MP 96950 (NAICS 236115). OSHA activity number 334705845.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- GINEN SAIPAN
- Site address
- NEW SINGLE FAMILY TWO STORY RESIDENCE PROJECT SAN ROQUE
- City
- SAIPAN
- State
- MP
- ZIP
- 96950
- Mailing
- PO BOX 503007 CHALAN KANOA, SAIPAN, MP 96950
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236115
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.300 B04 II
- Issued
- Aug 1, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 6, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,020 · Current $1,020
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.300(b)(4)(ii):The point of operation of machines whose operation exposes an employee to injury, were not guarded: (a) In the office hut onsite on or about June 18, 2012, and at times prior thereto, there was no point of operation guard for the blade on an Ace Hardware Professional 10 Miter Saw, model number 20624779C. The saw was used to cut wood for the formwork, scaffolding, and stairway.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1020
1926.452 A03
- Issued
- Aug 1, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 6, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,020 · Current $1,020
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(a)(3): Diagonal bracing in both directions was not installed across the entire inside face of double-pole scaffolds used to support loads equivalent to a uniformly distributed load of 50 pounds (222 kg) or more per square foot (929 square cm): (a) In the dining room and kitchen areas inside the house on or about June 18, 2012, and at times prior thereto, there was no diagonal bracing in both directions along the entire inside face of the double pole scaffold. The platform was 12.5 feet high and about 40 feet long. Employees work from the scaffold to pour concrete.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1020
1926.452 A04
- Issued
- Aug 1, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 6, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(a)(4): Diagonal bracing in both directions was not installed across the entire outside face of all double- and single-pole scaffolds: (a) In the dining room and kitchen areas inside the house on or about June 18, 2012, and at times prior thereto, there was no diagonal bracing in both directions along the entire outside face of the double pole scaffold. The platform was 12.5 feet high and about 40 feet long. Employees work from the scaffold to pour concrete.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.452 A07
- Issued
- Aug 1, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 6, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(a)(7): Runners were not supported by bearing blocks securely attached to the poles: (a) In the dining room and kitchen areas inside the house on or about June 18, 2012, and at times prior thereto, there were no bearing blocks to support the runners. The platform was 12.5 feet high and about 40 feet long. Employees work from the scaffold to pour concrete.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.452 A08
- Issued
- Aug 1, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 6, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(a)(8): Braces, bearers, and runners shall not be spliced between poles: (a) In the dining room and kitchen areas inside the house on or about June 18, 2012, and at times prior thereto, the runners were spliced between the poles. The platform was 12.5 feet high and about 40 feet long. Employees work from the scaffold to pour concrete.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1052 A02
- Issued
- Aug 1, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 6, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,020 · Current $1,020
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1052(a)(2): Stairs were not installed between 30 deg. and 50 deg. from horizontal: (a) In the dining room area inside the house on or about June 18, 2012, and at times prior thereto, the temporary stairs were not installed at angle between 30 and 50 degrees from the horizontal as they were installed at an angle of about 56.25 degrees from the horizontal. The top of the stairs was 6 feet high, and the bottom of the stairs was 4 feet from from the wall.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1020
1926.1052 C01 II
- Issued
- Aug 1, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 6, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1)(ii): Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever is less, were not equipped with one stairrail system along each unprotected side or edge: (a) In the dining room area inside the house on or about June 18, 2012, and at times prior thereto, the temporary stairs did not have a stairrail system along the west side of the stairs. The top of the stairs was 6 feet high, and the bottom of the stairs was 4 feet from from the wall.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1052 C04
- Issued
- Aug 1, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 6, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(4): Midrails, screens, mesh, intermediate vertical members, or equivalent intermediate structural members, were not provided between the top rail of the stairrail system and the stairway steps: (a) In the dining room area inside the house on or about June 18, 2012, and at times prior thereto, the temporary stairs did not have a midrail or equivalent between the toprail and the steps along the east side of the stairs. The top of the stairs was 6 feet high, and the bottom of the stairs was 4 feet from from the wall.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.404 C01 II A
- Issued
- Aug 1, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 6, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.404(c)(1)(ii)(A): Clearance from ground. Open conductors did not conform to the minimum clearances of 10 feet (3.05 m)-above finished grade, sidewalks, or from any platform or projection from which they might be reached: (a) Near the east side of the house under construction on or about June 18, 2012, and at times prior thereto, the non metallic sheath conductors suspended on poles were not at least 10 feet about the ground as they were 6 feet above the ground. The conductors supplied 110 VAC to temporary outlets.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Ginen Saipan
View Ginen Saipan's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236115)
More inspections in MP
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 334705845.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.