Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,201Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-31 Last loaded 2026-09-03

OSHA Inspection: TEGRANT ALLOYD BRANDS, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of TEGRANT ALLOYD BRANDS, INC. in 1401 PLEASANT STREET, DEKALB, IL 60115 (NAICS 326199). OSHA activity number 334780780.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Tegrant Alloyd Brands, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Tegrant Alloyd Brands, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1401 PLEASANT STREET
City
DEKALB
State
IL
ZIP
60115
Mailing
1401 PLEASANT STREET, DEKALB, IL 60115
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
326199
Employees
285
Ownership type
Private (A)

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 22, 2012
Abate by
Dec 28, 2012
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $3,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:    Thermoforming Room, Vacuum Thermoform Machine #15.  Process technician employee(s) bypassed the safety interlock switch on the machine's barrier gate guard in order to enter the machine while running to make "fine tuning" adjustments to the machine such as but not limited to pin adjustments, knife adjustments, form press ramp adjustments, match metal adjustments and chain tension adjustments.  While making adjustments, employee(s) were exposed to crushing, pinching, amputation and degloving injury hazards caused by the machine's moving parts.  The employer had developed lockout/tagout procedures to be utilized during tooling changeovers on the vacuum thermoform machines, but did not require that they be used during "fine tuning" adjustments.  Alternative measures providing effective employee protection were not utilized.    Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $3000
  • · Z (S) $5000

1910.147 D02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 22, 2012
Abate by
Dec 28, 2012
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $3,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(2): The machine or equipment was not turned off or shut down using the procedures established for the machine or equipment:    Thermoforming Room, Vacuum Thermoform Machine #15.  Process technician employee(s) bypassed the safety interlock switch on the machine's barrier gate guard in order to enter the machine while running to make "fine tuning" adjustments to the machine such as but not limited to pin adjustments, knife adjustments, form press ramp adjustments, match metal adjustments and chain tension adjustments.  While making adjustments, employee(s) were exposed to crushing, pinching, amputation and degloving injury hazards caused by the machine's moving parts. The employee(s) did not turn off or shut down the machine prior to performing servicing and maintenance adjustments.  Alternative measures providing effective employee protection were not utilized.    Abatement documentation required for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $3000
  • · Z (S) $5000

1910.147 D03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 22, 2012
Abate by
Dec 28, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(3): All energy isolating devices that were needed to control the energy to the machine or equipment were not physically located and operated in such a manner as to isolate the machine or equipment from the energy source(s):    Thermoforming Room, Vacuum Thermoform Machine #15.  Process technician employee(s) bypassed the safety interlock switch on the machine's barrier gate guard in order to enter the machine while running to make "fine tuning" adjustments to the machine such as but not limited to pin adjustments, knife adjustments, form press ramp adjustments, match metal adjustments and chain tension adjustments.  While making adjustments, employee(s) were exposed to crushing, pinching, amputation and degloving injury hazards caused by the machine's moving parts.  Energy isolating devices that were needed to control the energy to the machine were not utilized to isolate the machine from its energy source.  Alternative measures providing effective employee protection were not utilized.    Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.147 D04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 22, 2012
Abate by
Dec 28, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(4)(i): Lockout or tagout devices were not affixed to each energy isolating device by authorized employees:    Thermoforming Room, Vacuum Thermoform Machine #15.  Process technician employee(s) bypassed the safety interlock switch on the machine's barrier gate guard in order to enter the machine while running to make "fine tuning" adjustments to the machine such as but not limited to pin adjustments, knife adjustments, form press ramp adjustments, match metal adjustments and chain tension adjustments.  While making adjustments, employee(s) were exposed to crushing, pinching, amputation and degloving injury hazards caused by the machine's moving parts. Lockout devices were not affixed to energy isolating devices by the authorized employee performing the "fine tuning" adjustments.  Alternative measures providing effective employee protection were not utilized.      Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

View Tegrant Alloyd Brands, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 334780780.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.