Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: PIECO INC., DBA SUPERIOR TRIM

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of PIECO INC., DBA SUPERIOR TRIM in 2151 INDUSTRIAL DR, FINDLAY, OH 45839 (NAICS 336360). OSHA activity number 335093985.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Pieco INC., DBA Superior Trim for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Pieco INC., DBA Superior Trim is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2151 INDUSTRIAL DR
City
FINDLAY
State
OH
ZIP
45839
Mailing
P.O. BOX 118, FINDLAY, OH 45839
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
336360
Employees
120
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 105 exposed
Issued
Dec 17, 2012
Abate by
Jan 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,240 · Current $1,620 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE):    a) Pieco Inc. dba Superior Trim - Findlay, Ohio: On or about July 10, 2012, the employer failed to assess the entire workplace for hazards which would require the use of personal protective equipment (PPE). The employer did not require PPE in the spray booth area or the snap machine area and did not conduct an assessment in order to ensure that employees were adequately protected.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1620
  • · Z (S) $3240

1910.133 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 17, 2012
Abate by
Dec 28, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): Protective eye equipment was not required where there was a reasonable probability of injury that could be prevented by such equipment:    a) Pieco Inc. dba Superior Trim - Findlay, Ohio: On or about July 10, 2012, the employer failed to provide and require safety glasses for those employees exposed to hazards from severe eye irritation while spraying adhesives containing various chemicals, such as but not limited to, toluene, hexane, cyclohexane, and petroleum distillate.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.138 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 17, 2012
Abate by
Dec 28, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.138(a): The employer did not select and require employee(s) to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances; severe cuts or lacerations; severe abrasion; punctures; chemical burns; thermal burns; and harmful temperature extremes:     a) Pieco Inc. dba Superior Trim - Findlay, Ohio: On or about July 10, 2012, the employer failed to provide and require gloves for those employees exposed to hazards from skin contact while spraying adhesives containing various chemicals, such as but not limited to, toluene, hexane, cyclohexane, and petroleum distillate.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 17, 2012
Abate by
Jan 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,860 · Current $2,430 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s):    a) Pieco Inc. dba Superior Trim - Findlay, Ohio: On or about July 10, 2012, employees were exposed to hazards from point of operation when the employer failed to adequately guard the Kane-M (SN: 3043) snap machine.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2430
  • · Z (S) $4860

View Pieco INC., DBA Superior Trim's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335093985.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.