BONIFAY, FL —
OSHA Inspection: AUS MANUFACTURING COMPANY LLC
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of AUS MANUFACTURING COMPANY LLC in 704 WEST HIGHWAY 90, BONIFAY, FL 32425 (NAICS 332313). OSHA activity number 335133385.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- AUS MANUFACTURING COMPANY LLC
- Site address
- 704 WEST HIGHWAY 90
- City
- BONIFAY
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 32425
- Mailing
- 704 WEST HIGHWAY 90, BONIFAY, FL 32425
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332313
- Employees
- 9
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.178 L01 I
- Issued
- Sep 24, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 6, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer had not ensured that each powered industrial truck operator was competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by completion of the training and evaluation specified in paragraph (l) [Reference 29 CFR 1926.602(d) for construction]: a. On or about July 11, 2012, employees were using a Nissan Forklift to move fabricated metal parts throughout the shop area were not provided with formal instruction and an evaluation of the operators' performance prior to using the Nissan Forklift.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $1600
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Sep 24, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 6, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Machine guarding was not provided to protect operator(s) and other employees from hazard(s) created by rotating parts: a. On or about July 11, 2012, employees were exposed to caught-in hazards because Summit horizontal lathe chuck was not guarded.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1600
- — Z (S) $1600
1910.212 A03 I
- Issued
- Sep 24, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 6, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(i): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from sustaining an injury where the work was actually performed upon the material being processsed: a. On or about July 11, 2011, employees were exposed to struck-by hazard because the milling chuck on Lacun Republic milling machine was not guarded.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $1600
1910.215 A04
- Issued
- Sep 24, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 6, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Work rest(s) on grinding machinery were not adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one eighth inch: a. On or about July 11, 2011, employees were exposed to struck-by hazard, work rest on Balder Electric Company grinding machine on left hand side of workbench was greater than eighth-inch in distance. b. On or about July 11, 2011, employees were exposed to struck-by hazard, work rest on Balder Electric Company grinding machine on right hand side of workbench was greater than eighth-inch in distance.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $400
- — Z (S) $1600
1910.215 B09
- Issued
- Sep 24, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 6, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch. a. On or about July 11, 2012, employees were exposed to struck-by hazard, safety guard on Balder Electric Company grinding machine on left hand side of the workbench was greater than one-fourth-inch in distance. b. On or about July 11, 2012, employees were exposed to struck-by hazard, safety guard on Balder Electric Company grinding machine on right hand side of the workbench was greater than one-fourth-inch in distance.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Sep 24, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 6, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will met: a. On or about July 11, 2012, the employer did not develop and implement the written hazard communication program which described how requirements of 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) would be met for employees who have exposure to hazardous materials such as but not limited to TRIM SC520 cutting fluid, Dynaflux Enviro-Spat, and welding gas.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $1200
1910.1200 F05 I
- Issued
- Sep 24, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 6, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(i): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the identity of the hazardous chemical(s) contained therein: a. a. On or about July 11, 2012, the employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals such as but not limited to TRIM SC520 in the workplace was labeled with the identity of the hazardous chemical.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 F05 II
- Issued
- Sep 24, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 6, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the appropriate hazard warnings: a. a. On or about July 11, 2012, the employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals such as but not limited to TRIM SC520 in the workplace was labeled with the identity of the hazardous chemical.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Sep 24, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 6, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: a. On or about July 11, 2012, the employer did not provide effective information and training to employees on the hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to TRIM SC520 cutting fluid, Dynaflux Enviro-Spat, and welding gas in their work area.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at AUS Manufacturing Company LLC
View AUS Manufacturing Company LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332313)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335133385.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.