NEW MILFORD, CT —
OSHA Inspection: SALVADOR ORDONEZ CONSTRUCTION LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SALVADOR ORDONEZ CONSTRUCTION LLC in REAR OF 177 DANBURY ROAD, NEW MILFORD, CT 06776 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 335143582.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SALVADOR ORDONEZ CONSTRUCTION LLC
- Site address
- REAR OF 177 DANBURY ROAD
- City
- NEW MILFORD
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06776
- Mailing
- 117 PARK AVE APT 1, DANBURY, CT 06810
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.451 E01
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 24, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, sturcure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used. Worksite: Employees who were working on ladder jack scaffolds were not provided with a safe means of access to and egress from the scaffold.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.451 F07
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 26, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person. Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the ladder jack scaffolds had been inspected by a competent person prior to allowing employees to begin working on them.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.452 K05
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 26, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(k)(5): Scaffold platforms were bridged on to another. Worksite: Employees were working on a ladder jack scaffold that was comprised to two platforms which were bridged together.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 G01 I
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 24, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(i): Each employee on a boatswains' chair, catenary scaffold, float scaffold, needle beam scaffold, or ladder jack scaffold was not protected by a personal fall arrest system: Worksite: Employees were working on a ladder jack scaffold without fall protection and were exposed to fall hazards of up to 11 feet 4 inches.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 11, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: Worksite: The employer did not ensure that all employees had been trained in the hazards associated with falls and the proper ways and procedures which should be taking to minimize these hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 26, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access: Worksite: Employees were using an aluminum extension ladder to access the roof that did not extend at least three feet above the upper landing surface of the roof.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.1051 A
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 26, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1051(a): Stairways or ladders were not provided at all personnel points of access where there was a break in elevation of 19 inches (48 cm) or more, and no ramp, runway, sloped embankment, or personnel hoist was provided: Worksite: The employer did not provide a safe means of access for the employees working on the left side of the roof who were required to step up 26 inches from the ladder jack scaffold in order to get to the area where they were working.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B05 I
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 26, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(5)(i): Non-self-supporting ladders were not used at an angle such than the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder way approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder (the distance along the ladder between the foot and the top support). Worksite: The employer did not ensure the aluminum ladders that were being used to support the ladder jack scaffold had been set at the proper angle.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.501 B11
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 24, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $14,000 · Current $14,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11): Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: Worksite: Employees who were performing work on a steep roof were not required to wear fall protection and were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 11 feet 10 inches.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (W) $14000
More inspections at Salvador Ordonez Construction LLC
View Salvador Ordonez Construction LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335143582.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.