SAINT CHARLES, IL —
OSHA Inspection: WORK AREA PROTECTION CORP.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of WORK AREA PROTECTION CORP. in 2500 PRODUCTION DR., SAINT CHARLES, IL 60174 (NAICS 326199). OSHA activity number 335288585.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- WORK AREA PROTECTION CORP.
- Site address
- 2500 PRODUCTION DR.
- City
- SAINT CHARLES
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 60174
- Mailing
- 2500 PRODUCTION DR., SAINT CHARLES, IL 60174
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 326199
- Employees
- 35
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.334 C01
- Issued
- Aug 14, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 13, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,975 · Current $2,975
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.334(c)(1): Unqualified persons performed testing work on electric circuits or equipment. (a) On or about July 16, 2012, maintenance employee(s) who performed live voltage measurements on equipment inside 220V-480V electrical cabinets in the cones production area during servicing and repair were not qualified. Abatement note: Qualified persons shall be capable of working safely on energized circuits and shall be familiar with the proper use of special precautionary techniques, personal protective equipment, insulating and shielding materials and insulated tools. Abatement certification required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.19(c).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2975
- — Z (S) $2975
1910.335 A01 I
- Issued
- Aug 14, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 13, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,975 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(i): Employees working in areas where there were potential electrical hazards were not provided with electrical protective equipment that was appropriate for the specific parts of the body that needed to be protected and for the work being performed: (a) On or about July 16, 2012, maintenance employee(s) who performed live voltage measurements on equipment inside 220V-480V electrical cabinets in the cones production area during servicing and repair did not wear appropriate electrical protective equipment, including but not limited to the following, to protect against electrical shock and Arc flash/blast injuries: a) Rubber insulating gloves with leather protectors. b) Arc-Rated clothing such as arc-rated long-sleeve shirt and pants, or arc-rated coverall. c) Hearing protection (canal inserts). d) Arc-Rated flash suit, hood or balaclava. Abatement certification is required of this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c). Abatement Note: For compliance assistance, refer to NFPA 70E national consensus standard "Standard for Electrical Safety in the Workplace, 2012 Edition", www.NFPA.org.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2975
1910.335 A01 IV
- Issued
- Aug 14, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 13, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,975 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(iv): Employees exposed to the danger of head injury from electric shock or burns due to contact with exposed energized parts did not wear nonconductive head protection: a) On or about July 16, 2012, maintenance employee(s) who performed live voltage measurements inside 220V-480V electrical cabinets while servicing and repairing equipment did not wear nonconductive head protection such as hard hats with die-electric properties, to protect against electrical shock, burns, and Arc flash/blast. Abatement certification is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(c). Abatement Note: For compliance assistance, refer to NFPA 70E national consensus standard "Standard for Electrical Safety in the Workplace, 2012 Edition", www.NFPA.org
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2975
1910.335 A01 V
- Issued
- Aug 14, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 13, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,975 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(v): Employees exposed to the danger of injury to the eyes or face from electric arcs or flashes or from flying objects resulting from electrical explosion did not wear protective equipment for the eyes or face: a) On or about July 16, 2012, maintenance employee(s) who performed live voltage measurements inside 220V-480V electrical cabinets while servicing and repairing equipment did not wear face protection to prevent burns or injury from flying debris in the event of an Arc flash or blast. Abatement certification is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(c). Abatement Note: For compliance assistance, refer to NFPA 70E national consensus standard "Standard for Electrical Safety in the Workplace, 2012 Edition", www.NFPA.org
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2975
1910.37 A03
- Issued
- Aug 14, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 13, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(a)(3): Exit route was not kept free and unobstructed: a) In the cone production area, emergency exit door near Line #2 in the southwest corner of the building was propped open and the path of egress was blocked by a large industrial drum fan. Abatement certification is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(c).
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.147 C06 II
- Issued
- Aug 14, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 13, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(ii): The employer did not certify that periodic inspections of the energy control procedures had been performed: (a) The employer did not certify that periodic lockout/tagout inspections including a review with each authorized employee of their responsibilities had been conducted for all employees authorized to lockout equipment and machinery such as production conveyors, ovens, mixers, etc. Abatement certification is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(c).
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.178 L06
- Issued
- Aug 14, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 13, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): The employer did not certify that each operator had been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l). a) Warehouse, loading docks, mixing dept. The employer did not certify that all powered industrial truck operators had received a performance evaluation at least once every three years. Abatement certification is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(c).
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Work Area Protection Corp.
View Work Area Protection Corp.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 326199)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335288585.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.