JANESVILLE, WI —
OSHA Inspection: D & K COATING TECHNOLOGIES INC
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of D & K COATING TECHNOLOGIES INC in 1400 VENTURE DRIVE, JANESVILLE, WI 53548 (NAICS 326113). OSHA activity number 335325163.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- D & K COATING TECHNOLOGIES INC
- Site address
- 1400 VENTURE DRIVE
- City
- JANESVILLE
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53548
- Mailing
- 1400 VENTURE DRIVE, JANESVILLE, WI 53548
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 326113
- Employees
- 25
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.106 E06 I
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 11, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $3,150 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.106(e)(6)(i): Adequate precautions were not taken to prevent the ignition of flammable vapors: Mix room 2 Gauver coating tray, with flammable liquids, was ignited by static electricity.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3150
- — Z (S) $4500
1910.132 D01 I
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 11, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1)(i): The employer did not select and have each affected employee use, the types of personal protective equipment that would protect the affected employee(s) from the hazards identified in the hazard assessment: Employees work around flammable liquids were not wearing static dissipating footware.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $4500
1910.134 C02 I
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 11, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,700 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i): Respirator users were not provided with the information contained in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134 when the employer determined that any voluntary respirator use was permissible: Information in Appendix D was not provided for employees voluntarily using a half mask respirator to protect themselves from organic vapors.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $2700
1910.134 C02 II
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 11, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii): The employer did not establish and implement those elements of a written program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily was medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator was cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user: A medical evaluation was not provided for employees voluntarily using a half mask respirator to protect themselves from organic vapors.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 11, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee(s) ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: A medical evaluation was not provided for employees voluntarily using a half mask respirator to protect themselves from organic vapors.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.219 C04 I
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 11, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,700 · Current $1,890 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(c)(4)(i): Unguarded projecting shaft end(s) did not present a smooth edge and end and projected more than one half the diameter of the shaft: In mix room 2 there was an unguarded smooth half inch shaft (diameter) protruding 2 inches from an electric motor.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1890
- — Z (S) $2700
More inspections at D & K Coating Technologies INC
View D & K Coating Technologies INC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 326113)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335325163.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.