Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: BADGER TIRE & WHEEL, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of BADGER TIRE & WHEEL, INC. in N174 W21030 ALCAN DRIVE, JACKSON, WI 53037 (NAICS 326211). OSHA activity number 335410809.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Badger Tire & Wheel, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Badger Tire & Wheel, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
N174 W21030 ALCAN DRIVE
City
JACKSON
State
WI
ZIP
53037
Mailing
N174 W21030 ALCAN DRIVE, JACKSON, WI 53037
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
326211
Employees
28
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 14, 2012
Abate by
Sep 28, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $1,800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1):     The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative:      (a)  An energy control program had not been developed for maintenance and servicing on equipment, such as but not limited to the Kaeser air compressor. Employees were exposed to struck-by and/or entanglement hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1800
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 14, 2012
Abate by
Sep 28, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i):     Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:    (a)  Energy control procedures were not developed and utilized for maintenance and/or servicing of equipment, such as but not limited to the Kaeser air compressor. Employees were exposed to struck-by and/or entanglement hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.219 F03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 14, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(f)(3):     Sprocket wheels and chains which were seven -7 feet or less above floors or platforms were not enclosed:    (a)  The employer did not ensure the chain and sprocket was guarded on the High Pressure Inflator, exposing employees to entanglement hazards 28 inches off the floor.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.157 G01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 14, 2012
Abate by
Oct 15, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(1):     An educational program was not provided for all employees to familiarize them with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting:      (a) The employer did not provide training to those designated to fight incipient stage fires in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.178 L04 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 14, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii):     An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years:    (a)  The employer did not ensure powered industrial vehicle operators received a performance evaluation at least every 3 years.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.178 L06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 14, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6):     The employer did not certify that each operator has been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l):    (a)  The employer did not maintain records of certification for each powered industrial vehicle operator at their initial evaluation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 14, 2012
Abate by
Sep 28, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):     The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    (a) The employer did not develop and implement a Hazard Communication Program for employees handling chemicals, such as but not limited to Tire Slick and LP Gas. Employees were exposed to chemical hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 F05 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 14, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(i):     The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the identity of the hazardous chemical(s) contained therein:      (a)  The employer did not ensure chemicals were properly labeled with their appropriate contents. A canister was filled with Tire Slick Lubricant and did not have a chemical label.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 F05 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 14, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(ii):     The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the appropriate hazard warnings:      (a)  The employer did not ensure chemical containers were properly labeled with the hazard warnings of the contents. A canister was filled with Tire Slick Lubricant and did not have an appropriate chemical label.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 14, 2012
Abate by
Sep 28, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1):     Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:    (a)  The employer did not provide information on hazard communication, such as but not limited to appropriate labeling of containers and where to locate Material Safety Data Sheets. Employees were exposed to chemical hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Badger Tire & Wheel, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335410809.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.