LAKE CHARLES, LA —
OSHA Inspection: STINE, L.L.C.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of STINE, L.L.C. in 4501 NELSON ROAD, LAKE CHARLES, LA 70605 (NAICS 444110). OSHA activity number 335419180.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- STINE, L.L.C.
- Site address
- 4501 NELSON ROAD
- City
- LAKE CHARLES
- State
- LA
- ZIP
- 70605
- Mailing
- 4501 NELSON ROAD, LAKE CHARLES, LA 70605
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 444110
- Employees
- 101
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.23 C01
- Issued
- Sep 25, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 2, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $3,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1): Open-sided floor(s) or platform(s) 4 feet or more above the adjacent floor or ground level were not guarded by standard railings (or the equivalent as specified in 29 CFR 1910.23(e)(3)(i) through (v)), on all open sides: On or about 07/26/2012, in the Mezzanine area of the Drive-through, the employer failed to ensure that employees who retrieved cypress and/or spruce were protected from falling approximately eight (8) feet. The gate/railing installed functions like a swinging gate, which does not secure in place to rigidly guard the open side.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3500
- — Z (S) $7000
1910.37 A03
- Issued
- Sep 25, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,168 · Current $1,084 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(a)(3): Exit route(s) were not kept free and unobstructed: On or about 07/26/2012, in the southwest corner of the Drive-through, the employer did not ensure that an exit route was unobstructed. The exit door on the west wall was blocked by a large box that contained a bathtub.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1084
- — Z (S) $2168
1910.157 E03
- Issued
- Sep 25, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 2, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $5,100 · Current $2,550 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(3): Portable fire extinguishers were not subjected to an annual maintenance check and/or the annual maintenance date was not recorded, retained for one year, and available to the Secretary of Labor upon request: Instance 1: On or about 07/26/2012, on the Yale Veracitor 50VX forklift (serial # F856033) in the Drive-through, the employer did not ensure that the fire extinguisher was subjected to an annual maintenance check and the annual maintenance date was recorded and retained. Part of the inspection tag was broken off such that the most recent maintenance date was not available. Instance 2: On or about 07/26/2012, on the Caterpillar forklift (model # GP40K1, serial # AT29C00512) in the Drive-through, the employer did not ensure that the fire extinguisher was subjected to an annual maintenance check. The inspection tag denoted that the last annual maintenance check was performed on March 28, 2011. Instance 3: On or about 07/26/2012, on the storage rack adjacent to the exit door on the west wall of the Drive-through, the employer failed to ensure that the fire extinguisher was subjected to an annual maintenance check. The inspection tag denoted that the last annual maintenance check was performed on April 5, 2011. Instance 4: On or about 07/26/2012, on the Mitsubishi forklift (model # FGC25K, serial # AF82C-03462) in the Drive-through, the employer did not ensure that the fire extinguisher was subjected to an annual maintenance check. The inspection tag denoted that the last annual maintenance check was performed on March 28, 2011. Instance 5: On or about 07/26/2012, on the storage rack between B and Backside B in the Drive-through, the employer failed to ensure that the fire extinguisher was subjected to an annual maintenance check. The inspection tag denoted that the last annual maintenance check was performed on March 28, 2011. Instance 6: On or about 07/26/2012, adjacent to the overhead door on the north wall of Appliances (Yard), the employer failed to ensure that the fire extinguisher was subjected to an annual maintenance check. The inspection tag denoted that the last annual maintenance check was performed on March 28, 2011. Instance 7: On or about 07/26/2012, on the east wall of Vendor Return (VRO/Store), the employer failed to ensure that the fire extinguisher was subjected to an annual maintenance check. The inspection tag denoted that the last annual maintenance check was performed in February 2010.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2550
- — Z (S) $5100
1910.176 B
- Issued
- Sep 25, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 28, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $5,100 · Current $2,550 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.176(b): Storage of material created a hazard: On or about 07/26/2012, adjacent to the exit door north of the Mezzanine area in the Drive-through, the employer failed to ensure that multiple pieces of lumber stored vertically were secured against displacement. The rope, hook, and eyelet configurations installed on opposite sides of both storage platforms did not provide effective means to secure 14' long pieces of lumber in place and were broken; the rope was tied to one of the platform's side supports, was to be stretched laterally across the lower portion of the lumber, and hooked into an eyelet affixed to the other side of the platform.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2550
- — Z (S) $5100
1910.37 B06
- Issued
- Sep 25, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 1, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(6): Each exit sign was not illuminated to a surface value of at least five foot-candles (54 lux) by a reliable light source and distinctive in color: On or about 07/26/2012, in the southeast corner of the Drive-through, the employer did not ensure that the exit sign was illuminated. The sign, which was positioned above the exit door on the south wall, was made of paper and had the word "EXIT" printed on it in red.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.157 C04
- Issued
- Sep 25, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 26, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(c)(4): Portable fire extinguishers were not kept in their designated places at all times except during use: On or about 07/26/2012, on Backside A of the Drive-through, the employer did not ensure a portable fire extinguisher was kept in its designated place. The "FIRE EXTINGUISHER" sign affixed to a storage rack adjacent to the west wall was not accompanied by a fire extinguisher.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Stine, L.L.C.
View Stine, L.L.C.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 444110)
More inspections in LA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335419180.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.