PFLUGERVILLE, TX —
OSHA Inspection: JOSE VALDEZ
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JOSE VALDEZ in 1225 TOWN CENTER DR, PFLUGERVILLE, TX 78660 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 335461786.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- JOSE VALDEZ
- Site address
- 1225 TOWN CENTER DR
- City
- PFLUGERVILLE
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 78660
- Mailing
- 3407 KELSEY COVE, ROUND ROCK, TX 78664
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 7
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 2, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems. For residential construction work performed on the property: On or about July 23, 2012, and at times prior thereto, employees were engaged in construcion work and were not protected by a guardrail system, safety net system or personal fall arrest system, exposing the employees to a fall hazard of approximately 18 feet.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1680
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 14, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards. The program shall enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and shall train each employee in the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards. For construction work preformed on the multi-residental property: On ar about July 30, 2012, and at times prior thereto, employees working on the residentail property had not received training on the use of fall protection prior to being allowed to work in elevated places, exposing the employees to fall hazard of up to 18 feet.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1680
- — Z (S) $2800
More inspections at Jose Valdez
View Jose Valdez's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335461786.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.