Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: TWIN OAKS INDUSTRIES, INC.

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of TWIN OAKS INDUSTRIES, INC. in 2001 WEST GRAND, SALINA, KS 67401 (NAICS 332999). OSHA activity number 335508818.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Twin Oaks Industries, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Twin Oaks Industries, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2001 WEST GRAND
City
SALINA
State
KS
ZIP
67401
Mailing
2001 W. GRAND AVE., SALINA, KS 67401
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332999
Employees
55
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 10, 2012
Abate by
Oct 10, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): In any workplace where respirators are necessary to protect the health of the employee or whenever respirators are required by the employer, the employer shall establish and implement a written respiratory protection program with worksite-specific procedures. The program shall be updated as necessary to reflect those changes in workplace conditions that affect respirator use. The employer shall include in the program the following provisions of this section, as applicable:    A written respiratory protection program was not developed or implemented to include: medical evaluations; procedures for cleaning, storage, maintenance, and use of the respirators, as well as, training the employees on these procedures. An employee wearing a half-facepiece respirator was exposed to hazards associated with respirator use while priming parts.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1960
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 10, 2012
Abate by
Oct 10, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer shall provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee is fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:    An employee was exposed to respiratory hazards in that a medical evaluation was not provided to determine employee's ability to use a respirator.  A half-facepiece respirator was worn during priming jobs.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1960
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 10, 2012
Abate by
Oct 10, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): The employer shall ensure that an employee using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator is fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator facepiece (size, style, model or make) is used, and at least annually thereafter:    An employee was exposed to respiratory hazards in that a fit test was not provided prior to initial use and annually thereafter. Employee wore a half-facepiece respirator while applying primers.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1960
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.252 C13

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Sep 10, 2012
Abate by
Oct 10, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,470 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.252(c)(13): First-aid equipment shall be available at all times. All injuries shall be reported as soon as possible for medical attention. First aid shall be rendered until medical attention can be provided:    There were no designated first-aid trained personnel at the facility to render first aid until medical attention could be provided for welding employees. The employees were exposed to burns and other hazards associated with welding.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1470
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.253 B04 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Sep 10, 2012
Abate by
Oct 10, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.253(b)(4)(iii): Oxygen cylinders in storage shall be separated from fuel-gas cylinders or combustible materials (especially oil or grease), a minimum distance of 20 feet (6.1 m) or by a noncombustible barrier at least 5 feet (1.5 m) high having a fire-resistance rating of at least one-half hour:    Oxygen and acetylene cylinders outside the tool crib were stored next to each other, exposing employees to fire hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1960
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.1026 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Sep 10, 2012
Abate by
Oct 10, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $2,450 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1026(d)(1): Each employer who has a workplace or work operation covered by this section shall determine the 8-hour TWA exposure for each employee exposed to chromium (VI). This determination shall be made in accordance with either paragraph (d)(2) or paragraph (d)(3) of this section:    An initial assessment of welders' 8-hour time-weighted exposure to hexavalent chromium was not conducted for stainless steel welding. The employees were exposed to health hazards associated with hexavalent chromium exposure.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2450
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.1026 L01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Sep 10, 2012
Abate by
Oct 10, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $2,450 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1026(l)(1): In addition to the requirements of the Hazard Communication Standard, 29 CFR 1910.1200, employers shall comply with the requirements in 29 CFR 1910.1026(l)(2)(i)- (ii):    The employees welding on stainless steel components were not trained on the health hazards, location and use of chromium compounds, and protective measures needed against exposure to hexavalent chromium.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2450
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.1030 C01 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 10, 2012
Abate by
Oct 10, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,470 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(i): Each employer having an employee(s) with occupational exposure as defined by paragraph (b) of this section shall establish a written Exposure Control Plan designed to eliminate or minimize employee exposure:    An Exposure Control Plan was not developed to eliminate or minimize first aid responder's exposure to bloodborne pathogens.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1470
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 10, 2012
Abate by
Oct 10, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,470 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employers shall develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, material safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met:    A written hazard communication program was not developed or implemented to address labeling of containers, material safety data sheets, and training to inform employees of hazardous chemicals used in the paint booth such as primers and lacquer thinner.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1470
  • — Z (S) $2100

View Twin Oaks Industries, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335508818.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.