Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: RICARDO REYES

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of RICARDO REYES in 127 WARRAN AVE, WHITE PLAINS, NY 10607 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 335572806.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Ricardo Reyes — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Ricardo Reyes is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
RICARDO REYES
Site address
127 WARRAN AVE
City
WHITE PLAINS
State
NY
ZIP
10607
Mailing
3 HILLSIDE CLOSE, WHITE PLAINS, NY 10603
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.416 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Dec 14, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.416(a)(1): No employer shall permit an employee to work in such proximity to any part of an electric power circuit that the employee could contact the electric power circuit in the course of work, unless the employee is protected against electric shock by deenergizing the circuit and grounding it or by guarding it effectively by insulation or other means.    a) Job Site, 127 Warran Ave:  Six (6) employees were working in a proximity of live electrical wires, while ripping the roof, on or about; 8/2/2012.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $800
  • — C (S) $2800
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Dec 14, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.  Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.    a) Job Site, 127 Warran Ave:  Six (6) employees working on the roof removing old shingles were not protected from falling approximately 18' feet below; on or about 8/2/2012.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $800
  • — C (S) $2800
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Dec 14, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $776 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support.    a) Job Site, 127 Warran St, Front of House:  "Unidentify 22' high aluminum ladder". The aluminum extension ladder leading from the ground level to the roof, did not extended 3 feet above the landing area nor was secured; on or about 8/2/2012.      b) Job Site, 127 Warran Sr. Rear of House:  "Unidentify 23' high aluminum extension ladder". A ladder leading from the ground level to the roof, did not extended 3 feet above the landing area nor was secured, on or about 8/2/12.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $776
  • — C (S) $1600
  • — Z (S) $1600

View Ricardo Reyes's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335572806.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.