Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: KIEFER INDUSTRIES INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of KIEFER INDUSTRIES INC. in 400 INDUSTRIAL DR., RANDOM LAKE, WI 53075 (NAICS 333319). OSHA activity number 335753000.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Kiefer Industries INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Kiefer Industries INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
400 INDUSTRIAL DR.
City
RANDOM LAKE
State
WI
ZIP
53075
Mailing
400 INDUSTRIAL DR., RANDOM LAKE, WI 53075
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333319
Employees
12
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.95 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 10, 2012
Abate by
Jan 16, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,700 · Current $1,020 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1):     The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.9(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent:    a) In the metal polishing area, a hearing conservation program was not administered for a metal polisher who was exposed to continuous noise at a level of 75.9% of the permissible 8 hour time weighted average noise exposure, or an equivalent noise level of 88 dBA as an 8-hour time weighted average equivalent.  This exposure was determined by two (2)  noise samples taken on an employee over a 420 minute period during one workshift on 11/20/12. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled 60 minutes of an eight hour workshift.    ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION AND ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1020
  • — Z (S) $1700

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 8 exposed
Issued
Dec 10, 2012
Abate by
Jan 9, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,700 · Current $1,020 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.151(c):     Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:    a) On 8/15/12, access to the eyewash station was blocked by material storage.    b) On 8/15/12, the eyewash station was not maintained in a clean condition.    ABATEMENT CERTIFCATION AND ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1020
  • — Z (S) $1700

1910.1026 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 10, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,700 · Current $1,020 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1026(d)(1):     The employer with a workplace or work operation covered by this standard did not determine the 8-hour time-weighted average exposure for each employee exposed to chromium (VI):    a) In the stainless steel welding area, workers who were TIG welding stainless steel components containing up to 16% chrome, had not been monitored for Chrome (VI) exposure.    NO ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION OR ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1020
  • — Z (S) $1700

1910.1026 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 10, 2012
Abate by
Jan 12, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1026(l)(1)(i):     Chemical manufacturers, importers, distributors and employers shall comply with all requirements of the Hazard Communication Standard (HCS) ( 1910.1200) for chromium (VI):    a) The company's chemical hazard communication program did not address the hazards of Hexavalent Chromium exposure.  Employees were involved with welding of metals bearing 16% chrome.    ABATEMENT CERTIDICATION AND ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 G08

Serious Gravity 5 6 instances 8 exposed
Issued
Dec 10, 2012
Abate by
Jan 9, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,360 · Current $816 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8):     The employer did not ensure that material safety data sheets were readily accessible to the employees in their work area during each work shift:    a) On 8/15/12, a Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) for stainless steel was not readily accessible or maintained in the workplace.     b) On 8/15/12, an MSDS for Walter Solfox-H was not readily accessible or maintained in the workplace.     c) On 8/15/12, an MSDS for Walter Solfox-N was not readily accessible or maintained in the workplace.     d) On 8/15/12, an MSDS for Hydrite R inhibitor was not readily accessible or maintained in the workplace.    e) On 8/15/12, an MSDS for Sherwin Williams NEW spray paint was not readily accessible or maintained in the workplace.    f) On 8/15/12, an MSDS for Garnet was not readily accessible or maintained in the workplace.    ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION AND ABATEMENT DOCUMENTAION REQUIRED.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $816
  • — Z (S) $1360

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Dec 10, 2012
Abate by
Jan 12, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1):     Employers shall provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new physical or health hazard the employees have not previously been trained about is introduced into their work area. Information and training may be designed to cover categories of hazards (e.g., flammability, carcinogenicity) or specific chemicals. Chemical-specific information must always be available through labels and material safety data sheets.    a) An employee in the polishing area, and exposed to metal dusts, had not been informed of the details of the company's chemical hazard communication upon hiring.    b) An employee in the polishing area, and exposed to metal dusts, had not been trained as required by this paragraph, at the time of hiring, on the hazards of the chemicals to which there was exposure, and to the means to protect himself against those hazards.    ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION AND ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.141 A03 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 10, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.141(a)(3)(i):     All places of employment shall be kept clean to the extent that the nature of the work allows:    a) The restroom for the production area had mold growth on the walls.    NO ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION OR DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.141 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Dec 10, 2012
Abate by
Dec 28, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.141(d)(1):     Washing facilities were not maintained in a sanitary condition:    a) The wash sinks at the east wall of the shop were not maintained in a sanitary condition.    ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION AND DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Kiefer Industries INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335753000.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.