NESCOPECK, PA —
OSHA Inspection: ZEISER VAULT COMPANY
Referral inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of ZEISER VAULT COMPANY in 909 E. THIRD STREET, NESCOPECK, PA 18635 (NAICS 327390). OSHA activity number 335852588.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ZEISER VAULT COMPANY
- Site address
- 909 E. THIRD STREET
- City
- NESCOPECK
- State
- PA
- ZIP
- 18635
- Mailing
- PO BOX 521, NESCOPECK, PA 18635
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 327390
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.304 G05
- Issued
- Oct 12, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 27, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $1,440 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.304(g)(5): The paths to ground from circuits, equipment, and enclosures were not permanent, continuous, and effective. a) Pouring floor: a concrete vibrator, powered by a 120 volt electric motor, was powered through a 3 conductor cord set which was missing its grounding conductor in the male plug molding, on or about August 24, 2012. "ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED"
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1440
- — Z (S) $2400
1910.305 J02 IV
- Issued
- Oct 12, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 27, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(j)(2)(iv): Receptacles installed in wet or damp locations were not suitable for the location a) Pouring floor: a concrete vibrator was powered through a 120 volt single phase circuit which was not protected by ground fault circuit interruption, on or about August 24, 2012. "ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED"
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $960
- — Z (S) $1600
1910.136 A
- Issued
- Oct 12, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 27, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.136(a): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses protective footwear when working in areas where there is a danger of foot injuries due to falling or rolling objects, or objects piercing the sole, and where such employee's feet are exposed to electrical hazards: a) Production areas: employees carry heavy molds and concrete products. Employees also push and pull a concrete bucket suspended by a crane. Employees were exposed to foot crushing hazards and were not required to wear footwear that would protect their toes, on or about August 24, 2012. "ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED"
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $960
- — Z (S) $1600
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- Oct 12, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 27, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed through written certification that identified the workplace evaluated; the person certifying that the evaluation had been performed; the date(s) of the hazard assessment; and, identified the document as a certification of the hazard assessment a) Production areas, employees were exposed to foot crushing hazards without the use of personal protective equipment, and a written hazard assessment had not been prepared, on or about August 24, 2012. "ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED"
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 D01 III
- Issued
- Oct 12, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 27, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
0040246090109760
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form: a) Production areas, employees were exposed to silica, respirable quartz, which can cause pulmonary silicosis, and an evaluation of respiratory hazards was not performed, on or about August 24, 2012. b) Spray painting, employees were exposed to toluene, acetone, and mineral spirits which can affect the central nervous system, and an evaluation of respiratory hazards was not performed, on or about August 24, 2012. "ABATEMENT OBSERVED DURING INSPECTION - NO CERTIFICATION REQUIRED"
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $720
- — Z (S) $1200
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Oct 12, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 27, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
004024609760
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: a) Painting area, employees wore negative pressure, cartridge type, elastomeric facepiece respirators as protection against organic solvent vapors, and a written respiratory protection program was not implemented, on or about August 24, 2012. "ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED"
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Oct 12, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 27, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
004024609760
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a) Painting area, employees wore negative pressure, cartridge type, elastomeric facepiece respirators as protection against organic solvent vapors, and employees did not receive a medical evaluation to ensure that they were physically able to wear the respirator without adverse health effects, on or about August 24, 2012. "ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED"
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F01
- Issued
- Oct 12, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 27, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
004024609760
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT): a) Painting area, employees wore negative pressure, cartridge type, elastomeric facepiece respirators as protection against organic solvent vapors, and employees did not receive a fit test to determine if the respirator had a sufficient seal against their faces to work effectively, on or about August 24, 2012. "ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED"
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 H01
- Issued
- Oct 12, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 27, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
004024609760
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(1): Respirators were not cleaned and disinfected using the procedures in Appendix B-2 of 29 CFR 1910.134 or equivalent procedures recommended by the respirator manufacturer: a) Painting area, employees wore negative pressure, cartridge type, elastomeric facepiece respirators as protection against organic solvent vapors, and sealing surfaces of the respirator were not kept clean, on or about August 24, 2012. "ABATEMENT OBSERVED DURING INSPECTION - NO CERTIFICATION REQUIRED"
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 H03 I A
- Issued
- Oct 12, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 27, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
004024609760
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(3)(i)(A): Respirators used in routine situations were not inspected before each use and during cleaning: a) Painting area, employees wore negative pressure, cartridge type, elastomeric facepiece respirators as protection against organic solvent vapors, and one respirator was missing one of its inhalation valves, on or about August 24, 2012. "ABATEMENT OBSERVED DURING INSPECTION - NO CERTIFICATION REQUIRED"
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Zeiser Vault Company
View Zeiser Vault Company's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 327390)
More inspections in PA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335852588.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.