FRANKLIN, NH —
OSHA Inspection: FREDERICK A. MEYER III & SONS, INC.
Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of FREDERICK A. MEYER III & SONS, INC. in 528 RIVER ST. EXT., FRANKLIN, NH 03235 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 335869459.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- FREDERICK A. MEYER III & SONS, INC.
- Site address
- 528 RIVER ST. EXT.
- City
- FRANKLIN
- State
- NH
- ZIP
- 03235
- Mailing
- PO BOX 608, SANBORNVILLE, NH 03872
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Unprogrammed Other (I)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238140
- Employees
- 14
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.405 B01
- Issued
- Dec 21, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 2, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,200 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.405(b)(1): Unused openings in cabinets, boxes, and fittings were not effectively closed: Jobsite: Two circuit breaker twist out openings, in the temporary panel, were not effectively closed/sealed.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $2200
1926.451 E06
- Issued
- Dec 21, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 2, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(6): Integral prefabricated scaffold access frames did not meet the requirements of paragraphs (e)(6)(i)-(vi) of this section: Jobsite: The end frames of the fabricated frame scaffold, used by the employees to access the elevated platforms, did not meet OSHA requirements for climbing.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 B01
- Issued
- Dec 21, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 2, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,080 · Current $3,080
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii) Jobsite: The elevated platform of the fabricated frame scaffold, used by the employees building a concrete block wall, was not fully planked.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3080
- — Z (S) $3080
1926.451 C02
- Issued
- Dec 21, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 2, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,200 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, and uprights did not bear on base plates and mud sills or other adequate firm foundation: Jobsite: The upright legs of the fabricated frame scaffold, used by the employees to erect a block wall, did not bear on a firm foundation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2200
1926.451 E01
- Issued
- Dec 21, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 2, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,200 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used. Jobsite: The employees, accessing the elevated platforms of the fabricated frame scaffold, were not provided with a proper means of access.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2200
1926.451 G01 VII
- Issued
- Dec 21, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 2, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,080 · Current $2,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section. Jobsite: The employees, working on the elevated platforms of the fabricated frame scaffolds, were not protected from the hazard of falling to lower levels.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $3080
1926.451 H02 II
- Issued
- Dec 21, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 2, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,080 · Current $1,540 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(h)(2)(ii): A toe board was not erected along the edge of platforms more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower levels for a distance sufficient to protect employees below: Jobsite: The employees, working in and around the areas beneath the elevated platforms of the fabricated frame scaffold, were not protected from falling objects by toe boards erected along the edges of the platforms.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1540
- — Z (S) $3080
1926.451 H02 III
- Issued
- Dec 21, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 2, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(h)(2)(ii): Where tools, materials or equipment were piled higher than top edge of the toe board, paneling or screens were not erected from the top of the toe board or platform to the top of the guardrail. Jobsite: The employees, working in and around the areas beneath the elevated platforms of the fabricated frame scaffolds, were not protected from objects, piled higher than toe board height, from falling on them.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.454 C
- Issued
- Dec 21, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 18, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,320 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(c): The employer had reason to believe that an employee lacked the skill or understanding needed for safe work involving the erection, use or dismantling of scaffolds, and the employer did not retrain such employee so that the requisite proficiency was regained: Jobsite: The employees, exposed to various scaffold hazards while working on, under and around the elevated platforms of the fabricated frame scaffolds, were not retrained to recognize the hazards related to scaffolds or the procedures to control or minimize them.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $1320
1926.701 B
- Issued
- Dec 21, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 2, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,080 · Current $500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.701(b): All protruding reinforcing steel, onto and/or into which employees could fall or come against, was not guarded to eliminate the hazard of impalement: Jobsite: The employees, working on the scaffold above and in the vicinity of the protruding rebar, were not adequately protected from impalement hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $500
- — Z (S) $3080
More inspections at Frederick a. Meyer III & Sons, INC.
View Frederick a. Meyer III & Sons, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238140)
More inspections in NH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335869459.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.