Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,191,871Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-30 Last loaded 2026-08-03

OSHA Inspection: POWER HOUSE RETAIL SERVICES

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of POWER HOUSE RETAIL SERVICES in 16408 US HWY 83, HARLINGEN, TX 78552 (NAICS 541420). OSHA activity number 335898581.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Power House Retail Services for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Power House Retail Services is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
16408 US HWY 83
City
HARLINGEN
State
TX
ZIP
78552
Mailing
1376 HILL CREST, NEW BRAUNFELS, TX 78130
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
541420
Employees
25
Ownership type
A

1 citation on file for this inspection.

1910.333 B02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 17, 2012
Abate by
Nov 23, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.333(b)(2):     While an employee was exposed to contact with parts of fixed electric equipment or circuits which were deenergized, the requirements of paragraph (b) of 29 CFR 1910.333 were not followed in the order in which they are presented therein (i.e., paragraph (b)(2)(i) first, then paragraph (b)(2)(ii), etc.):    At the job site, employees performing various sign maintenance tasks such as, but not limited to, replacing light bulbs or flourescent tubes, replacing ballasts, and replacing electrical wiring were not protected against potential electrical hazards:    A. The employer had not written and implemented a written program specifying the procedures employees were to use to deenergize electrical circuits at remote job sites.    B. Locks and tags were not provided to servicing employees so that the circuits energizing the parts being worked on could be locked-out and tagged-out after being deenergized.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1800
  • · Z (S) $2800

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335898581.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.