Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: HIGHLAND PROJECTS LLC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of HIGHLAND PROJECTS LLC. in 301 ORCHARD LANE, BILLINGS, MT 59101 (NAICS 331210). OSHA activity number 335922787.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Highland Projects LLC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Highland Projects LLC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
301 ORCHARD LANE
City
BILLINGS
State
MT
ZIP
59101
Mailing
PO BOX 31492, BILLINGS, MT 59107
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
331210
Employees
51
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.23 C01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 11, 2012
Abate by
Oct 18, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $2,940 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1): Open-sided floor(s) or platform(s) 4 feet or more above the adjacent floor or ground level were not guarded by standard railings on all open sides:    (a) Buffer Tank Area: On or about August 24, 2012, and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 11.5 feet while welding metal grating on buffer tanks without fall protection.     (b) Buffer Tank Area: On or about August 31, 2012, and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 5.5 feet when welding tops on 100 barrel tanks while standing on an elevated 2x8 without fall protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2940
  • — Z (S) $4200

1910.26 C03 VII

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 11, 2012
Abate by
Oct 18, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.26(c)(3)(vii): Ladders were used as a brace, skid, guy or gin pole, gangway, or for other uses than that for which they were intended:     (a) Buffer Tank Area: On or about August 31, 2012, and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 5.5 feet while standing on a 2x8 in which one end rested on the top rung of a portable metal step ladder and the other end rested on a rung of another portable metal step ladder.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 11, 2012
Abate by
Oct 18, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,470 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:    (a) Paint Area: On or about August 31, 2012, and at times prior thereto, an employee was exposed to hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to, methylene bisphenyl isocyanate while painting and foaming and used an Allegro supplied ambient air respirator. The employer did not provide a medical evaluation prior to the respirator use.    (b) Paint Area: On or about August 31, 2012, and at times prior thereto, an employee was exposed to hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to, methylene bisphenyl isocyanate while painting and foaming and used a North half-face air purifying respirator. The employer did not provide a medical evaluation prior to the respirator use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1470
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 11, 2012
Abate by
Oct 18, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):    (a) Paint Area: On or about August 31, 2012, and at times prior thereto, an employee was exposed to methylene bisphenyl isocyanate at concentrations of approximately 0.005 ppm up to approximately 0.013 ppm and used a North half-face air purifying respirator. The employer did not provide fit testing prior to the respirator use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 11, 2012
Abate by
Oct 18, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    (a) Piece Work Area: On or about August 24, 2012, and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to the hazard of flying chips and pieces while using equipment such as, but not limited to, the Black Bull 16 speed drill press without a chuck guard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1960
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.212 B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 11, 2012
Abate by
Oct 18, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(b): Machine(s) designed for fixed location(s) were not securely anchored to prevent walking or moving:    (a) Piece Work Area: On or about August 24, 2012, and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to the hazard of becoming struck-by equipment such as, but not limited to, the Black Bull 16 speed drill press that was not anchored to the floor.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1960
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Oct 11, 2012
Abate by
Oct 18, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    (a) Production Areas: On or about August 24, 2012, and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to hazardous chemicals and metals such as, but not limited to, styrene, methylene bisphenyl isocyanate , manganese, and iron oxide.   The employer did not provide employees with a written hazard communication program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1960
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Oct 11, 2012
Abate by
Oct 18, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:    (a) Paint Area: On or about August 24, 2012, and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to, methylene bisphenyl isocyanate and styrene while painting. The employer did not provide employees with an effective hazard communication program which includes adequate training.     (b) Welding Areas: On or about August 24, 2012, and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to hazardous metals such as, but not limited to, manganese and iron oxide while welding. The employer did not provide employees with an effective hazard communication program which includes adequate training.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Highland Projects LLC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335922787.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.