Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: LETICA CORPORATION

Federal Agency inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a federal Agency safety inspection of LETICA CORPORATION in 2 COMMERCE ROAD, PITTSTON, PA 18641 (NAICS 322219). OSHA activity number 336243183.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Letica Corporation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Letica Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
LETICA CORPORATION
Site address
2 COMMERCE ROAD
City
PITTSTON
State
PA
ZIP
18641
Mailing
2 COMMERCE ROAD, PITTSTON, PA 18641
Inspection type
Federal Agency (M)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
322219
Employees
92
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 8, 2013
Abate by
Apr 24, 2013
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $2,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:  a) Printing area: The rollers on a 4-color printing machine were not equipped with an in-running nip point guard exposing workers to an amputation hazard, on or about September 12, 2012.  ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2500
  • — Z (S) $5000

1910.303 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 8, 2013
Abate by
Mar 20, 2013
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $2,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2): Listed or labeled electrical equipment was not used or installed in accordance with instructions included in the listing or labeling:  a) Printing area: A metal receptacle box, approved for fixed installations, was attached to a flexible cord and used for purpose other than that which it was approved exposing workers to an electric shock hazard, on or about September 12, 2012.  ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2500
  • — Z (S) $5000

1910.305 G01 IV A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 8, 2013
Abate by
Mar 20, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(A): Flexible cords and/or cables were used as a substitute for the fixed wiring of a structure:  a) Printing area: An extension cord fitted with a metal receptacle box had been installed in place of permanent wiring to to power a pair of portable fans exposing workers to an electric shock hazard, on or about September 12, 2012.  ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.305 G02 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 8, 2013
Abate by
Mar 20, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(iii): Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that tension would not be transmitted to joints or terminal screws:  a) Printing area: The flexible cord attached to a metal receptacle box was not provided with strain relief exposing workers to an electric shock hazard, on or about September 12, 2012.  ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 C02 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 8, 2013
Abate by
Apr 24, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii): The employer did not establish and implement those elements of a written program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily was medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator was cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user:   a) Maintenance Area: A maintenance worker who uses an air purifying respirator had not been medically screened to ensure that the use of a respirator does not create a health hazard, on or about September 12, 2012.  ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Letica Corporation's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 336243183.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.