Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: LETICA CORPORATION

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of LETICA CORPORATION in 3715 S PHILLIPS RD., LANETT, AL 36863 (NAICS 326199). OSHA activity number 342405883.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Letica Corporation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Letica Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
LETICA CORPORATION
Site address
3715 S PHILLIPS RD.
City
LANETT
State
AL
ZIP
36863
Mailing
P.O. BOX 5005 ATTN: MARA LETICA SAAD, ROCHESTER, MI 48308
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
326199
Employees
1867
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.23 C01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 5, 2017
Abate by
Nov 17, 2017
Penalty
Initial $12,675 · Current $7,605 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1): 29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1): Open sided floor(s) or platform(s) 4 feet or more above the adjacent floor or ground level were not guarded by standard railings (or the equivalent as specified in 29 CFR 1910.23(e)(3)(i) through (v)), on all open sides:    a) Production area, tool change; On or about June 13, 2017 and times prior: The employer failed to ensure employees conducting tool change set-up were provided with fall protection when they worked from on top of the tooling head changing hoses which exposed them to the hazards associated with falls of 8 feet 1 inches to the concrete floor below, or parts of the machine.    b) Production area, tool change; On or about June 13, 2017 and times prior: The employer failed to ensure employees  conducting work on the hoppers on line #8 and #9 were protected from falls when removing the hopper which exposed them to fall hazards of 12 feet 1 inch to the concrete floor.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $7605
  • — Z (S) $12675

1910.133 A01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 5, 2017
Abate by
Nov 9, 2017
Penalty
Initial $5,432 · Current $3,259 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): Protective eye equipment was not required where there was a reasonable probability of injury that could be prevented by such equipment:    a) Forklift battery charging; On or about June 13, 2017 and times prior: The employer failed to ensure employees filling forklift batteries with a water hose wore protective equipment such as goggles or face shied in addition to their safety glasses which exposed them tot he hazards associated with battery acid splash into the eyes.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $3259
  • — Z (S) $5432

1910.151 C

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 5, 2017
Penalty
Initial $5,432 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:    a) Forklift battery charging; On or about June 13, 2017 and times prior; The employer failed to ensure the emergency eyewash provided for rinsing eyes in case of exposure to battery acid had the water pressure properly adjusted with a low flow stream  to prevent additional damage to the eyes during emergency use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $5432

1910.178 Q07

Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Oct 5, 2017
Abate by
Nov 9, 2017
Penalty
Initial $5,432 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were being placed in services after the examination showed condition(s) adversely affecting the safety of the vehicle:    a) On or about June 14, 2017 and times prior; maintenance forklift: The employer failed to ensure the Nissan forklift, serial # KCUGH02P901604 was taken out of service due to the gas peddle missing the rubber pad.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $5432

1910.219 C04 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 5, 2017
Abate by
Nov 9, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.219(c)(4)(i): Unguarded projecting shaft end(s) did not present a smooth edge and end and projected more than one half the diameter of the shaft:    a) Machine #2; On or about June 13, 2017 and times prior; The employer exposed employees to amputation hazards in that employees were allowed to walk and work in close proximity of an unguarded projecting shaft end that projected more than one half times the diameter of the shaft on the conveyor next on machine #2.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Letica Corporation's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342405883.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.