Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: U.S. POSTAL SERVICE BARRIGADA P&DC

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of U.S. POSTAL SERVICE BARRIGADA P&DC in 489 ARMY DRIVE, BARRIGADA, GU 96913 (NAICS 491110). OSHA activity number 336253182.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch U.S. Postal Service Barrigada P&DC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for U.S. Postal Service Barrigada P&DC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
489 ARMY DRIVE
City
BARRIGADA
State
GU
ZIP
96913
Mailing
489 ARMY DRIVE, BARRIGADA, GU 96913
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
491110
Employees
80
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 E01

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Oct 17, 2012
Abate by
Oct 31, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee is fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace. The employer may discontinue an employee's medical evaluations when the employee is no longer required to use a respirator.    U.S. Postal Service, Barrigada P&DC:  On September 12, 2012, and at times prior thereto, maintenance employees were wearing N95 respirators for conducting work including, but not limited to sweeping, and no medical evaluation was conducted to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3000

1910.134 K06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Oct 17, 2012
Abate by
Oct 31, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(6): The basic advisory information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D of this section, was not provided by the employer in any written or oral format, to employees who wear respirators when such use is not required by this section or by the employer.       U.S. Postal Service, Barrigada P&DC:  On September 12, 2012 and at times prior thereto, maintenance employees were wearing N95 respirators for conducting work including, but not limited to, sweeping, were not given basic advisory information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.212 B

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Oct 17, 2012
Abate by
Oct 31, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(b): The employer did not ensure that machines designed for a fixed location be securely anchored to prevent walking or moving.    U.S. Postal Service, Barrigada PD&C General Repair Shop, Room 147:  On Septmeber 12, 2012, and at times prior thereto, the pedestal for the Central Machinery brand six inch bench grinder used by maintenance staff was not securely anchored to the floor to prevent walking or moving.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $3000

1910.1200 F05 II

Serious Gravity 1 9 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Oct 17, 2012
Abate by
Oct 31, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(ii): The employer did not ensure that appropriate hazard warnings, or alternatively, words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof, which provide at least general information regarding the physical and health hazards of the hazardous chemical.    U.S. Postal Service, Barrigada P&DC: On September 12, 2012, and at times prior thereto,  the employer failed to ensure that hazard warning labels were not placed on secondary containers containing, but not limited to the following: bleach, Skilcraft clean All Purpose Cleaner, and Rite-Ken Dust Mop Treatment that were used for cleaning surfaces.  Many containers were reused bottles of Windex, further limiting proper communication of the hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $3000

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 336253182.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.