Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: CHUCK MARTIN MASONRY

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of CHUCK MARTIN MASONRY in 3101 SW 24TH ST., OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73108 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 336488796.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Chuck Martin Masonry — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Chuck Martin Masonry is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3101 SW 24TH ST.
City
OKLAHOMA CITY
State
OK
ZIP
73108
Mailing
354969 E. 820 RD., STROUD, OK 74079
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 15, 2012
Abate by
Dec 3, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $600 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i):     The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator was competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l)      On or about September 20, 2012, at the jobsite an employee was observed operating a high lift forklift truck without prior training or evaluation by a qualified person.  Employees were exposed to hazards caused by inexperienced forklift truck operator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $600
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.452 C04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 15, 2012
Abate by
Nov 20, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.452(c)(4):     End frames of tubular welded frame scaffolding were not locked together vertically by use of pins or equivalent means in areas where uplift could occur:      On or about September 20, 2012, at the jobsite materials were observed being loaded onto scaffolds by a forklift truck this may cause an uplifting condition to the scaffolds however, the frames of the scaffolds were not locked together vertically by locking pins or equivalent means.  Employees were exposed to the hazards of the scaffolds being uplifted and/or collapsed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 B01 I

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 15, 2012
Abate by
Nov 19, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1)(i):     Each platform unit (e.g., scaffold plank, fabricated plank, fabricated deck, or fabricated platform) was not installed so that the space between adjacent units and the space between the platform and the uprights were no more than 1 inch (2.5 cm) wide, except where the employer can demonstrate that a wider space is necessary.      On or about September 20, 2012, at the jobsite employees were observed working from a fourth level of a 4-tier scaffold where the platforms were not fully planked or decked.  Employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 24-ft to the ground.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.451 F07

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 15, 2012
Abate by
Nov 21, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7):     Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration:; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person.      On or about September 20, 2012, at the jobsite employees were observed working from a 4-tier scaffold which was built by unqualified employees and there was not under supervision of a competent person.  Employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 24-ft to the ground.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 15, 2012
Abate by
Nov 19, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1):     Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section:      On or about September 20, 2012, at the jobsite employees were observed working from fourth levels of 4-tier scaffolds without guard rails or personal fall arrest system provided.  Employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 24-ft to the ground.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 C01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 15, 2012
Abate by
Nov 20, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(1):     Supported scaffolds with a height to base width (including outrigger supports, if used) ratio of more than four to one (4:1) were not restrained from tipping by guying, tying, bracing, or equivalent means, as set forth in subparagraphs (i) - (iii) of this paragraph.      On or about September 20, 2012, at the jobsite employees were observed working from 4-tier scaffolds approximately 24 feet high with the height to width ratio of more than four to one (4:1) that were not restrained from tipping by guying, tying or bracing.  Employees were exposed to the hazards of the scaffolds being tipped over.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.451 C02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 15, 2012
Abate by
Nov 21, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2):     Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, and uprights did not bear on base plates and mud sills or other adequate firm foundation:      On or about September 20, 2012, at the jobsite employees were observed working from 4-tier scaffolds approximately 24-ft high.  The scaffolds legs were laid on uneven ground without using mud sills this may cause the scaffolds to be unstable.  Employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 24-ft to the ground.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 C03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 15, 2012
Abate by
Nov 20, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(3):     Supported scaffold poles, legs, post, frames, and/or uprights were not plumb and braced to prevent swaying and displacement:      On or about September 20, 2012, at the jobsite employees were observed working from 4-tier scaffolds approximately 24-ft high that the scaffolds poles, legs, posts, frames and uprights were provided with diagonal braces in the front only and not in the back.  Employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 24-ft to the ground.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Chuck Martin Masonry's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 336488796.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.