Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: JOSE ALVAREZ

Unprogrammed Related inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related safety inspection of JOSE ALVAREZ in 7 CARRAGE LANE, RIVERSIDE, CT 06878 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 336618988.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Jose Alvarez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Jose Alvarez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
JOSE ALVAREZ
Site address
7 CARRAGE LANE
City
RIVERSIDE
State
CT
ZIP
06878
Mailing
8 THAMES STREET, NORWALK, CT 06851
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Related (G)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.304 I01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 15, 2012
Abate by
Oct 17, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.304(i)(1):   Each circular hand-fed ripsaw was not guarded by a hood which completely enclosed that portion of the saw above the table and that portion of the saw above the material being cut:    Jobsite:  The Dewalt circular hand fed rip saw that was used by employees to rip/cut cedar shingles was not guarded with a hood that completely enclosed the portion of the saw above the table.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.451 G01 VII

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 15, 2012
Abate by
Oct 16, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii):  Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section.    Jobsite:  The employees who were working from the fabricated metal frame scaffold platforms at heights of approximately 10 feet 2.5 inches above the ground were not protected from fall hazards by the use of guardrails or personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 15, 2012
Abate by
Oct 16, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $2,400
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1):   Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii)    Jobsite:  The employer did not ensure that each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was fully planked or decked, from which the employees were working from.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2400

1926.451 B05 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 15, 2012
Abate by
Oct 16, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(5)(i):   The end of a platform 10 feet or less in length, extended over its support more than 12 inches:    Jobsite: The platform from which the employees were working from extended 22 inches and was not guarded to prevent the employees from stepping on the cantilevered section.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 B08

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 15, 2012
Abate by
Oct 16, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(8):   At all points of a scaffold where the platform changes direction, such as turning a corner, the platform that rests on a bearer at an angle other than a right angle was not laid first.      Jobsite:  The angled platform section, from which the employees were working from was not laid first on the support of the frame of the scaffold, exposing the employees to tripping hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 C02

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 15, 2012
Abate by
Oct 16, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2):   Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, and uprights did not bear on base plates and mud sills or other adequate firm foundation:    Jobsite:  The supported scaffold that the employees were performing roofing work from did not have its legs bearing on base plates.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.454 B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 15, 2012
Abate by
Oct 29, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $2,400
29 CFR 1926.454(b):   The employer did not have each employee involved in erecting, disassembling, moving, operating, repairing, maintaining, or inspecting a scaffold trained by a competent person to recognize any hazards associated with the work in question.    Jobsite:  The employer did not ensure that each employee that was involved in erecting and maintaining the welded frame scaffold was trained in the procedures and recommendations for the safe erection and inspection of the scaffold that was used by the employees to perform roofing work.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2400

View Jose Alvarez's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 336618988.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.