NEW HAVEN, CT —
OSHA Inspection: RIZZO CORPORATION
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of RIZZO CORPORATION in LOT#7 PARKING GARAGE SCSU, NEW HAVEN, CT 06515 (NAICS 236220). OSHA activity number 336621982.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- RIZZO CORPORATION
- Site address
- LOT#7 PARKING GARAGE SCSU
- City
- NEW HAVEN
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06515
- Mailing
- 64 TRIANGLE STREET, DANBURY, CT 06810
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236220
- Employees
- 30
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.501 B04 II
- Issued
- Oct 26, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 31, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $5,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(4)(ii): Each employee on a walking/working surface was not protected from tripping in or stepping into or through holes by covers. Jobsite: The employer did not ensure that workers on a walking/working surface were not be protected from tripping in or stepping into the expansion joints and un finished portions of the stair landings.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $5000
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.501 B04 III
- Issued
- Oct 26, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 30, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(4)(iii): Each employee on a walking/working surface was not protected from objects falling through holes (including skylights) by covers: Jobsite: The employer did not ensure that workers on a walking/working surface were protected from tripping in or stepping into the expansion joints and un finished portions of the stair landings.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.501 B14
- Issued
- Oct 26, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 30, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(14): Each employee working on, at, above, or near wall openings (including those with chutes attached), where the outside bottom edge of the wall opening was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels and the inside bottom edge of the wall opening is less than 39 inches (1.0 M) above the walking/working surface, is not protected from falling by the use of a guardrail system, a safety net system, or a personal fall arrest system. Jobsite The exterior walls of the structure did not meet the requirements of guarding and exposed employees to fall hazards of up to and including 33 feet to the ground.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $4900
1926.1052 C01
- Issued
- Oct 26, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 29, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $5,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1): Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever is less, were not equipped with at least one handrail and one stairrail system along each unprotected side or edge: Jobsite; The GC did not ensure that there was guard / hand rails on the exterior stairway systems that employees were using to get to the higher levels and exposed to falls of up to 57 feet 3 inches.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $5000
- — Z (S) $4900
1926.1052 C07
- Issued
- Oct 26, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 29, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(7): The top edge of a stairrail system served as a handrail and the height of the top edge was less than 36 inches (91.5 cm) from the upper surface of the stairrail system to the surface of the tread, in line with the face of the riser. Jobsite; The temporary wire rope at a height of 26 inches on the exterior stairwells that was used for the combination stairrail / handrails was not the required height to serve as either a stairrail or handrail.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $4900
1926.1052 C12
- Issued
- Oct 26, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 29, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(12): Unprotected sides and edges of stairway landings were not provided with guardrail systems that meet the criteria contained in Subpart M of 29 CFR 1926: Jobsite The 32 landings of the 4 exterior stairwells that the employees were using to walk up to the higher levels did not have guard rails that meet the requirements of 42 inches + or 3 inches. Note: Guarding of landings for stairways and ladders are being maintained under Subpart M.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $4900
More inspections at Rizzo Corporation
View Rizzo Corporation's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236220)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 336621982.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.