JEFFERSON CITY, MO —
OSHA Inspection: ABB INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ABB INC. in 500 W. HIGHWAY 94, JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 (NAICS 335311). OSHA activity number 336664586.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ABB INC.
- Site address
- 500 W. HIGHWAY 94
- City
- JEFFERSON CITY
- State
- MO
- ZIP
- 65101
- Mailing
- 500 W. HIGHWAY 94, JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- A
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 335311
- Employees
- 700
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Oct 11, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 26, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $4,900 Reduced
General-duty citation text
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to an amputation hazard: Inside of the Tool Room, the following machines were not equipped with emergency stops: a/ Bridgeport Milling Machine, Series I. b/ Walker-Turner Drill Press, s/n 2072646. c/ Walker-Turner Drill Press, s/n 2072646. One method of abatement to correct this apparent hazard is to install emergency stops as required by ANSI B11.8-2001, paragraph 6.12.3. DISCLAIMER: a/ The employer is not limited to the abatement method(s) suggested by OSHA. b/ The employer is responsible for selecting and implementing an effective abatement method.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4900
- — Z (S) $7000
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Oct 11, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 26, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to an amputation hazard: Inside of the 241 Single-Phase Tank Line, each two-hand device was not designed and constructed to protect each hand control against unintended or inadvertent operation for the following machine(s): a/ Wing Bender Machine, unknown m/n or s/n. b/ Tank Emboss Machine, unknown m/n or s/n. Inside of the 221 Three-Phase Tank Department, each two-hand device was not designed and constructed to protect each hand control against unintended or inadvertent operation for the following machine(s): a/ Cincinnati 21174 Small Parts Press. One method of abatement to correct this apparent hazard is to protect each hand control against unintended or inadvertent operation by installing ring or palm guards or other fabricated shields as required by ANSI B11.19-2010, paragraph 8.4.1.1. DISCLAIMER: a/ The employer is not limited to the abatement method(s) suggested by OSHA. b/ The employer is responsible for selecting and implementing an effective abatement method.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Oct 11, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 26, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to an amputation hazard: Inside of the 221 Three-Phase Tank Line, the palm buttons belonging to a two-hand device were not arranged by design, construction, or separation to require the use of both hands for actuation for the following machine(s): a/ Minster No. 6 Mechanical Punch Press, unknown s/n. One method of abatement to correct this apparent hazard is to arrange each hand control so that both hands are required for actuation as required by ANSI B11.19-2010, paragraph 8.4.1.2. DISCLAIMER: a/ The employer is not limited to the abatement method(s) suggested by OSHA. b/ The employer is responsible for selecting and implementing an effective abatement method.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Oct 11, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 26, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: Inside of the Tool Room, chucks belonging to the following machines were inadequately guarded: a/ South Bend Lathe 16-Inch. b/ South Bend Lathe 20-Inch. Inside of the 221 Three-Phase Tank Department, the following machines were inadequately guarded: a/ The feeder belonging to the Georg Fin Folding Machine. Inside of the Maintenance Department, chucks belonging to the following machines were inadequately guarded: a/ Delta Rockwell Drill Press, m/n 15-017, s/n 1596931. b/ Allen Drill Press, JC-0963. Inside of the 111 Core Fabrication Department, the following machines were inadequately guarded: a/ Colt Automation Feeder #1. This machine is equipped with two feeders. b/ Colt Automation Feeder #2. This machine is equipped with two feeders. c/ Colt Automation Feeder #3. This machine is equipped with two feeders. d/ Colt Automation Feeder #4. This machine is equipped with two feeders. e/ Colt Automation Feeder #5. This machine is equipped with two feeders. f/ Colt Automation Feeder #6. This machine is equipped with two feeders.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.212 A03 II
- Issued
- Oct 11, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 26, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s): Inside of the Tool Room, the point-of-operation belonging to the following machines was unguarded: a/ Delta Vertical Belt Sander, unknown m/n or s/n. Inside of the 241 Single Phase Tank Fabrication Department, the point-of-operation belonging to the following machines was inadequately guarded: a/ Cincinnati Press Brake #3. b/ Cincinnati Press Brake #2660. c/ Pacific Press Brake J Series. Inside of the Maintenance Department, the point-of-operation belonging to the following machines was unguarded: a/ Delta Rockwell Vertical Belt Sander, JC-3319.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at ABB INC.
View ABB INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 335311)
More inspections in MO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 336664586.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.