LAKE CITY, GA —
OSHA Inspection: DIXIEN, LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of DIXIEN, LLC in 5286 CIRCLE DRIVE, LAKE CITY, GA 30260 (NAICS 336370). OSHA activity number 336817598.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- DIXIEN, LLC
- Site address
- 5286 CIRCLE DRIVE
- City
- LAKE CITY
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 30260
- Mailing
- 5286 CIRCLE DRIVE, LAKE CITY, GA 30260
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 336370
- Employees
- 67
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.147 C04 II
- Issued
- Mar 19, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 5, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii): Procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the scope, purpose, authorization, rules, and techniques to be utilized for the control of hazardous energy, and the means to enforce compliance including, but not limited to, 29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(A), (c)(4)(ii)(B), (c)(4)(ii)(C) and (c)(4)(ii)(D)(h): a. Worksite - The lockout procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the sources of energy and methods and techniques for control of and removal of stored and residual energy when employees worked on the mechanical power presses.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.178 A04
- Issued
- Mar 19, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 5, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(4): Modifications and additions which affect capacity and safe operation of powered industrial truck were performed by the employer without the manufacturer's prior written approval: a. Worksite - The Royal Forklift (Serial number IG784LP) had been modified in that the addition of counter weights to the rear of the forklift had not been approved by the manufacturer.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.215 A04
- Issued
- Mar 19, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 29, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Work rest(s) on grinding machinery were not adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one eighth inch and Grinding machinery was not used with work rest(s) to support offhand grinding work: a. Maintenance area tool crib - The smaller bench grinder was not provided a work rest for both abrasive wheels exposing employees to amputation hazards. b. Maintenance Area tool crib - The larger bench grinder was not provided with a work rest on one abrasive wheel and the single work rest which was provided was not adjusted to a maximum opening of less than 1/8th of an inch width exposing employees to struck by and amputation hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.215 B03
- Issued
- Mar 19, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 5, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(3): Bench and floor stands. The angular exposure of the grinding wheel periphery and sides for safety guards used on machines known as bench and floor stands should not exceed 90 deg. or one-fourth of the periphery. a. Maintenance area tool crib - The larger bench grinder was equipped with a guard that exposed more than one fourth of the periphery of the wheel exposing employees to struck by and amputation hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.215 B09
- Issued
- Mar 19, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 29, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch and/or the guard for abrasive wheel machine where the operator stands in front of the machine was not constructed so that the peripheral protecting member could be adjusted to the constantly decreasing diameter of the wheel: a. Maintenance area tool crib- The smaller bench grinder equipped with 2 tongue guards for the abrasive wheels did not have the tongue guards adjusted to the periphery of the wheel to ensure that the opening was less than 1/4 of an inch thereby exposing employees to struck by and amputation hazards. b. Maintenance area tool crib - The larger bench grinder left side abrasive wheel tongue guard was not adjusted so that the opening was less than a 1/4 inch thereby exposing employees to struck by and amputation hazards. c. Maintenance area tool crib - The larger bench grinders right side abrasive wheel was not equipped with a tongue guard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.217 B01
- Issued
- Mar 19, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 5, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.217(b)(1): Machine component(s) of mechanical power press(es) were not designed, secured, or covered to minimize hazards caused by breakage, or loosening and falling, or release of mechanical energy: a. Green line machine 1100 - The moving and rotating parts and belts on the rear of the mechanical power press were not covered to minimize hazards caused by breakage or falling, exposing employees to struck by hazards. b. Green line machine 1320 - The moving and rotating parts such as but not limited to: the flywheel were not covered and guarded thereby exposing employees to struck by hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.217 C01 I
- Issued
- Mar 19, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 5, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $1,960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.217(c)(1)(i): The employer did not provide and ensure the usage of point of operation guards or properly applied point of operation devices on every operation performed on mechanical power press(es): a. Green line machine 1200 - The point of operation on the mechanical power press was not provided with point of operation guards thereby exposing employees to amputation hazards on the front, side and rear of the press. b. Green line machine 1320 - The point of operation on the mechanical power press was not provided with point of operation guards thereby exposing employees to amputation hazards on the front and rear of the press. c. Green line machine 1299 - The point of operation on the mechanical power press was not provided with point of operation guards thereby exposing employees to amputation hazards on the front, side and rear of the press. d. Green line machine 1318 - The point of operation on the mechanical power press was not provided with working point of operation guards, thereby exposing employees to amputation hazards on the front and rear of the presss. The light curtains were not functioning. e. Green line machine 1198 - The guarding on the mechanical power press did not guard the point of operation. The guards on the machine were not interlocked with the drive mechanism and stayed up during activation of the controls, thereby exposing employees to amputation hazards. f. Green line machine 1100 - The guarding on the mechanical power press did not guard the point of operation. The guards on the machine were not interlocked with the drive mechanism and stayed up during activation of the controls, thereby exposing employees to amputation hazards. g. Yellow area machine 1163 - The point of operation on the mechanical power press was not guarded thereby exposing employees to amputation hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1960
- — Z (S) $4900
1910.217 E01 I
- Issued
- Mar 19, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 5, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.217(e)(1)(i): A program of periodic and regular inspections of mechanical power press(es) was not established and followed to ensure that all parts, auxiliary equipment and safeguards were in a safe operating condition and adjustment: a. Facility - The employers established a regular and periodic inspection of the mechanical power presses did not ensure that all safety guards and other protective measures were operational and/or properly adjusted.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.217 F02
- Issued
- Mar 19, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 29, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.217(f)(2): Operator(s) were not trained and instructed in the safe method of work before starting work on mechanical power press(es): a. Facility - The operators of the mechanical power presses had not been trained in safe operational methods which would included but are not limited too: The use, function and necessity of safety guarding on the mechanical power presses.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.303 B01
- Issued
- Mar 19, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 5, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(1): Electrical equipment was not free from recognized hazards that were likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees, in that the employer did not ensure the safety of the equipment pursuant to the considerations in sections (i) through (viii) of 29 CR 1910.303(b)(1): a. Green area - The Verson twin circuit control was modified in that the handle on the door of the 480 Volt cabinet had been replaced with a handle which was not approved by the manufacturer
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400
- — Z (S) $3500
More inspections at Dixien, LLC
View Dixien, LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 336370)
More inspections in GA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 336817598.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.