PLATTSBURGH, NY —
OSHA Inspection: CAMOPLAST ROCKLAND, LTD.
Referral inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of CAMOPLAST ROCKLAND, LTD. in 1 MARTINA CIRCLE, PLATTSBURGH, NY 12901 (NAICS 326291). OSHA activity number 336960596.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CAMOPLAST ROCKLAND, LTD.
- Site address
- 1 MARTINA CIRCLE
- City
- PLATTSBURGH
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 12901
- Mailing
- 1 MARTINA CIRCLE, PLATTSBURGH, NY 12901
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 326291
- Employees
- 100
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Feb 11, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 16, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $4,250 · Current $3,188 Reduced
8110811191309135A100
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included thge provisions in 1910.1349(c)(1)(i)-(ix) with worksite-specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: a). On or about 10/18/12, on site, for the employee conducting sandblasting operations and required to don Moldex N95 2600 respirator. The employer did not implement a respiratory protection program to include training, medical evaluations, and fit tests. Abatement Note: The following are the specific areas that need to be written in the program: 1910.134(c)(1)(ii) Medical evaluations of employees 1910.134(c)(1)(iii) Fit testing procedures 1910.134(c)(1)(iv) Procedures for proper use of respirators 1910.134(c)(1)(v) Procedures and schedules for cleaning, disinfecting, storing, inspecting, repairing, and discarding. 1910.134(c)(1)(vii) Training of employees of the respiratory hazards. 1910.134(c)(1)(viii) Training of employees in the proper use of respirators. 1910.134(c)(1)(ix) Procedures for regularly evaluating the effectiveness of the program
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3187.5
- — Z (S) $4250
1910.134 D01 III
- Issued
- Feb 11, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 16, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace: a). On or about 10/18/12, on site, for the employee conducting sandblasting operations and required to don Moldex N95 2600 respirator. The employer did not conduct an evaluation to identify if respiratory hazards existed in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 K
- Issued
- Feb 11, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 16, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide effective training to employees who were required to use respirators: a). On or about 10/18/12, on site, for the employee conducting sandblasting operations and required to don Moldex N95 2600 respirator. The employer did not implement a respiratory protection program to include training.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Feb 11, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 16, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $4,250 · Current $3,188 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee is fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a). On or about 10/18/12, on site, for the employee conducting sandblasting operations and required to don Moldex N95 2600 respirator. The employer did not implement a respiratory protection program to include medical evaluations.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3187.5
- — Z (S) $4250
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Feb 11, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 16, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: a). On or about 10/18/12, on site, for the employee conducting sandblasting operations and required to don Moldex N95 2600 respirator. The employer did not implement a respiratory protection program to include fit tests.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Camoplast Rockland, LTD.
View Camoplast Rockland, LTD.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 326291)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 336960596.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.