HOUSTON, TX —
OSHA Inspection: PROMAXIMA MANUFACTURING LTD.
Referral inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of PROMAXIMA MANUFACTURING LTD. in 5310 ASHBROOK DRIVE, HOUSTON, TX 77081 (NAICS 339920). OSHA activity number 337024996.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- PROMAXIMA MANUFACTURING LTD.
- Site address
- 5310 ASHBROOK DRIVE
- City
- HOUSTON
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 77081
- Mailing
- 5310 ASHBROOK DRIVE, HOUSTON, TX 77081
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 339920
- Employees
- 200
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 2013
- Abate by
- May 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $2,205 Reduced
T405
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that on November 5, 2012, an employee was exposed to 0.22 milligrams per cubic meter of 1,3,5-triglycidyl isocyanurate (TGIC). Exposure to TGIC is capable of causing physical illness including allergic contact dermatitis, serious eye irritation, respiratory sensitization and occupational asthma, mutated DNA, and reduced sperm count as documented in reports by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, and the World Health Organization.
Recent events (6)
- — F $14750
- — C $27000
- — Z $27000
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Apr 19, 2013
- Abate by
- May 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
T405
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: a) The employer had not established and implemented a written respiratory protection program. Employees are required to use 3M full-face air-purifying respirators for protection from particulates when spraying powder coatings. b) The employer did not designate a program administrator who was qualified by appropriate training or experience. Employees are required to use 3M full-face air-purifying respirators for protection from particulates when spraying powder coatings.
Recent events (3)
- — R (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Apr 19, 2013
- Abate by
- May 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a) Employees do not receive medical evaluations to determine their ability to use a respirator before the employees are required to wear 3M full-face, air-purifying respirators while spraying powder coatings containing TGIC.
Recent events (3)
- — R (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Apr 19, 2013
- Abate by
- May 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
T405
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit-tested prior to initial use of the respirator: a) Employees were not fit-tested prior to using 3M full-face, air-purifying respirators for protection from particulates when spraying powder coatings.
Recent events (3)
- — R (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 H02 I
- Issued
- Apr 19, 2013
- Abate by
- May 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
T405
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(2)(i): Respirators were not stored to protect them from damage, contamination, dust, sunlight, extreme temperatures, excessive moisture, and damaging chemicals: a) In the restroom of the Powder Coating Department, on or about October 22, 2012 - 3M full-face, air-purifying respirators, used by employees for protection from particulates when spraying powder coatings, were stored uncovered on a hook; hence exposed to dust, barium sulphate, titanium dioxide and 1,3,5-Triglycidyl Isocyanurate.
Recent events (3)
- — R (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.107 B05 IV
- Issued
- Apr 19, 2013
- Abate by
- May 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $5,400 · Current $2,646 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(5)(iv): Space within the spray booth on the downstream and upstream sides of filters were not protected with approved automatic sprinklers: a) In the Powder Coating Department, on or about October 22, 2012 - The spray booth closest to the bay door was not equipped with automatic sprinklers on the downstream and upstream sides of the filters. Employees spray a flammable powder coating. This condition exposed employees to a fire hazard. b) In the Powder Coating Department, on or about November 5, 2012 - The Nordson Vantage RCM powder spray booth was not equipped with automatic sprinklers on the downstream and upstream sides of the filters. Employees spray a flammable powder coating. This condition exposed employees to a fire hazard.
Recent events (6)
- — F $14750
- — C $27000
- — Z $27000
1910.107 B09
- Issued
- Apr 19, 2013
- Abate by
- May 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $5,400 · Current $2,646 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(9): A clear space of not less than 3 feet on all sides was not kept free from storage or combustible construction: a) In the Powder Coating Department, on or about October 22, 2012 - The space adjacent to the spray booth closest to the bay door was used for storing combustibles such as empty cardboard boxes. Employees spray a flammable powder coating. This condition exposed employees to a fire hazard. b) In the Powder Coating Department, on or about November 5, 2012 - The space adjacent to the Nordson Vantage RCM spray booth was used for storing combustibles such as empty cardboard boxes. Employees spray a flammable powder coating. This condition exposed employees to a fire hazard.
Recent events (3)
- — R (S) $2646
- — C (S) $5400
- — Z (S) $5400
1910.134 D01 III
- Issued
- Apr 19, 2013
- Abate by
- May 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $2,205 Reduced
T405
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form: a) In the Powder Coating Department, on or about November 5, 2012 - The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazards and perform a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to 1,3,5-triglycidyl isocyanurate. Employees are exposed to this substance when spraying powder coatings such as, but not limited to, Vitracoat Epox. Satin Black 4701 (ENL50018) and Vitracoat PSM2005 Poly. Limited Bright Silver 18238. b) In the Powder Coating Department, on or about November 5, 2012 - The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazards and perform a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to titanium dioxide, epoxy resins, and barium sulphate. Employees are exposed to these substances when spraying powder coatings such as, but not limited to, Vitracoat Epox. Satin Black 4701 (ENL50018) and Vitracoat PSM2005 Poly. Limited Bright Silver 18238.
Recent events (3)
- — R (S) $2205
- — C (S) $4500
- — Z (S) $4500
1910.307 B
- Issued
- Apr 19, 2013
- Abate by
- May 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $2,205 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.307(b): Areas designated as hazardous (classified) locations under the Class and Zone system and areas designated under the Class and Division system established after August 13, 2007 were not properly documented: a) In the Powder Coating Department, on or about November 5, 2012 - Hazardous (classified) locations, such as areas subject to deposits of combustible residue, and areas in close proximity to powder coating operations, were not properly documented.
Recent events (3)
- — R (S) $2205
- — C (S) $4500
- — Z (S) $4500
1910.307 C
- Issued
- Apr 19, 2013
- Abate by
- May 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.307(c): Equipment, wiring methods, and installations of equipment in hazardous (classified) locations were not intrinsically safe, approved for the hazardous (classified) location, or safe for the hazardous (classified) location: a) In the Powder Coating Department, on or about November 5, 2012, - The fluorescent lighting above the Nordson Vantage RCM spray booth was not approved for a classified location. Employees spray a flammable powder coating. This condition exposed employees to an explosion/fire hazard.
Recent events (3)
- — R (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Promaxima Manufacturing LTD.
View Promaxima Manufacturing LTD.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 339920)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337024996.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.