Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: DISH NETWORK

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of DISH NETWORK in 1285 JOE BATTLE BOULEVARD SUITE A, EL PASO, TX 79936 (NAICS 517110). OSHA activity number 337089189.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Dish Network — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Dish Network is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
DISH NETWORK
Site address
1285 JOE BATTLE BOULEVARD SUITE A
City
EL PASO
State
TX
ZIP
79936
Mailing
1285 JOE BATTLE BOULEVARD, EL PASO, TX 79936
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
517110
Employees
4027
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.303 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Feb 22, 2013
Abate by
Apr 18, 2013
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $3,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(a) The conductors and equipment required or permitted by this subpart were not acceptable, as defined in Sec. 1910.399.    It was found on October 12, 2012, the employer designed, produced, and installed unapproved equipment.  A device called the Smart Box 3 was not approved by a Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory and was not tested and examined for workplace safety, nor was the Smart Box 3 determined to be safe on the basis of test data.  Subsequently, the completed device design did not account for a reverse polarity wiring occurring when the Smart Box 3 casing was created.
Recent events (3)
  • — R (S) $3500
  • — C (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.304 A02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Feb 22, 2013
Abate by
Mar 6, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.304(a)(2) A grounded conductor was attached to a terminal or lead so as to reverse designated polarity.    It was found on October 12, 2012, the employer designed, produced, and installed unapproved equipment.  Through the development and manufacturing process of the Smart Box 3, the design of the casing for the smart box did not account for the power boot to be turned 180 degrees on the vertical, resulting in switching the neutral and hot conductors for the system.  No safety testing had been done once a complete Smart Box 3 unit was created to determine if the completed, end user piece of equipment would be safe for employees to use.
Recent events (3)
  • — R (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.304 G05

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Feb 22, 2013
Abate by
Mar 6, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.304(g)(5) The path to ground from circuits, equipment, and enclosures were not effective.    It was found on October 12, 2012, the grounding path from the receivers to the Smart Box to the Smart Tree was not effective exposing employees to a shock hazard.
Recent events (3)
  • — R (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.305 G02 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Feb 22, 2013
Abate by
Apr 18, 2013
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(ii)  Flexible cords were not used in continuous lengths or without splices or taps.     It was found on October 12, 2012, the employer had attempted to correct a reverse polarity wiring of their Smart Box 3 equipment by splicing the flexible cord used to power the equipment, reversing the conductors to eliminate the reversed polarity, then securing the conductors together with electrical wing nuts, then using red electrical tape to insulate the wiring.
Recent events (3)
  • — R (O) $2000
  • — C (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.334 A03 III

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Feb 22, 2013
Abate by
Apr 18, 2013
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $3,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.334(a)(3)(iii)  Adapters which interrupt the continuity of the equipment grounding connection may not be used.    It was found on November 6, 2012, the employer had installed 3-2 adapter on electrical outlets which employees use to plug in receivers to be tested.  The adaptor does not have a grounding pin and is instead equipped with a grounding screw tab which is to be screwed into the wall plate, center screw of the outlet.  During the walk around several adaptors were observed to have their grounding tab severely damaged, some completely uninstalled from the screw plate.
Recent events (3)
  • — R (S) $3500
  • — C (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $7000

View Dish Network's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337089189.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.