Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SOUTHERN TILE ROOFING, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SOUTHERN TILE ROOFING, INC. in LOT 11 ELY COURT, SEACREST, FL 32413 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 337131791.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Southern Tile Roofing, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Southern Tile Roofing, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
LOT 11 ELY COURT
City
SEACREST
State
FL
ZIP
32413
Mailing
435 CAPTAINS CIRCLE, DESTIN, FL 32541
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 C02 IV

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(iv): Front-end loaders and similar pieces of equipment were used to support scaffold platforms when they were not specifically designed by the manufacturer for such use:    a. On or about October 30, 2012, four employees used a Omni Quip forklift truck to elevate themselves in a wooden trash bin to perform roofing operations, exposing themselves to a 24 feet 5-inch fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.451 C02 V

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(v): Fork-lifts were used to support scaffold platforms while the entire platform was not attached to the fork and the fork-lift was moved horizontally while the platform was occupied:    a. On or about October 30, 2012, four employees used an Omni Quip forklift truck to elevate themselves in a wooden trash bin, exposing themselves to a fall hazard in that the wooden trash bin was not adequately secured to the forks or the mast.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 G01 VII

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section:    a. On or about October 30, 2012, four employees performing roofing operations by use of a makeshift scaffold system were not protected from a 24 feet 5-inch fall hazard by use of a guardrail system or personal fall arrest system.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2012
Abate by
Dec 27, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards:    a. On or about October 30, 2012, employees were not trained to recognize, control or minimize hazards while performing roofing operations using a makeshift scaffold system.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b):    a. On or about October 30, 2012, an employee performing roofing operations, such as installing clay tile shingles was not protected from a 24 feet 5-inch fall hazard by use of a guardrail system, safety net system, personal fall arrest system or any alternative fall protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

View Southern Tile Roofing, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337131791.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.