COLUMBUS, GA —
OSHA Inspection: GENTRY MACHINE WORKS, INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of GENTRY MACHINE WORKS, INC. in 5110 TRANSPORT BLVD., COLUMBUS, GA 31907 (NAICS 332710). OSHA activity number 337145841.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- GENTRY MACHINE WORKS, INC.
- Site address
- 5110 TRANSPORT BLVD.
- City
- COLUMBUS
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 31907
- Mailing
- 5110 TRANSPORT BLVD., COLUMBUS, GA 31907
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332710
- Employees
- 50
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- Mar 28, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 23, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification which included the requirements as outlined in 29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2) a) Machine/Fabrication Shop: The employer did not certify that a workplace hazard assessment had been conducted to select appropriate PPE for crane operators, machinist, and fabricators.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2100
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.136 A
- Issued
- Mar 28, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 23, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.136(a): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses protective footwear when working in areas where there is a danger of foot injuries due to falling or rolling objects, or objects piercing the sole, and where such employee's feet are exposed to electrical hazards: a) Machine and Fabrication Shops: Employees operating overhead hoists were exposed to struck-by hazards because there was no requirement to wear protective footwear when handling steel plates.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.147 C01
- Issued
- Mar 28, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 23, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $2,940 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative: a) Machine and Fabrication shop: Employees were exposed to mechanical energy, pneumatic energy, and electrical hazards while performing maintenance and servicing on equipment such as, but not limited to: Computer Numerical Controlled (CNC) vertical lathes, cranes and compressors, because the employer had not developed an energy control program.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2940
- — Z (S) $4900
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Mar 28, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 23, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, and rotating parts: a) Machine Shop: Employees were exposed to caught-in and struck by hazards while operating a bed type milling machine. The machine was not guarded to protect employees from the rotating parts or flying objects. b) Fabrication Shop: The employer exposed an employee operating a hydraulic press brake to a caught-in hazard. The press was not guarded at the point of operation, and no safe work procedures were in place.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2100
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.178 L06
- Issued
- Mar 28, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 23, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): The certification did not include the name of the operator, the date of the training, the date of the evaluation, and the identity of the person(s) performing the training or evaluation: a) Shipping/Receiving: The employer did not provide documentation of training or evaluations of powered industrial truck operators within the facility.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Gentry Machine Works, INC.
View Gentry Machine Works, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332710)
More inspections in GA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337145841.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.